Epstein Secrets

ivilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 05372 04/20/2009 Marc Nurik Bradley Edwards litigation Strategy W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissi

/02/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Meeting w/Stanley Arkin Joint W/P Priv. 06861-06863 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06876.06879 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Stuart Mermelstein RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06891-06897 05/

irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 11175-11183 04/27/2009 Marc Nurik Bradley Edwards Epstein Case info Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery

ted to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02411-02413 05/12/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley J. Edwards Jane Doe II v. Epstein Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidenc

ivilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 05372 04/20/2009 Marc Nurik Bradley Edwards Litigation Strategy W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissi

/02/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Meeting w/Stanley Arkin Joint W/P Priv. 06861-06863 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06876-06879 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Stuart Mermelstein RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06891-06897 05/

irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 11175-11183 04/27/2009 Marc Nurik Bradley Edwards Epstein Case info Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery

ted to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02411-02413 05/12/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley J. Edwards Jane Doe II v. Epstein Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidenc