Epstein Secrets

t and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 05292 07/22/2009 Attorneys at RRA Ken Jenne RE: Epstein Meeting W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; pro

and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 26716.26717 09/04/2009 Mike Fisten Ken Jenne NR as a victim W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by

/02/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Meeting w/Stanley Arkin Joint W/P Priv. 06861-06863 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06876.06879 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Stuart Mermelstein RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06891-06897 05/

t and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 05292 07/22/2009 Attorneys at RRA Ken Jenne RE: Epstein Meeting W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; pro

and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 26716-26717 09/04/2009 Mike Fisten Ken Jenne NR as a victim W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by

/02/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Meeting w/Stanley Arkin Joint W/P Priv. 06861-06863 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06876-06879 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Stuart Mermelstein RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06891-06897 05/

irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 01787-01788 09/04/2009 Ken Jenne Bradley J. Edwards 1. Accountants 2. Motion for IME Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lea

ted to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02411-02413 05/12/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley J. Edwards Jane Doe II v. Epstein Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidenc

irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 01787.01788 09/04/2009 Ken Jenne Bradley J. Edwards 1. Accountants 2. Motion for IME Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lea

ted to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02411-02413 05/12/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley J. Edwards Jane Doe II v. Epstein Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidenc