Epstein Secrets

ion of Jeffrey Epstein? MR. SCAROLA: Same objection [work-product, attorney-client privilege]. Id., at 201. Q. [D]id you ever authorize or direct Ken Jenne to perform any investigation on the Epstein files? MR. SCAROLA: Same objection [work-product, attorney-client privilege] and instruction. 12. Co

ranscript at 50, 54, 91, 100-104, 114, 126,-127, 155, 170, 181, 184-187, 192, 198-202, 205-206, 208-210, 212, 215-217; Exhibit 1. Forty years ago, the Florida Supreme Court, in Surf Drugs, Inc. v. Vermette, 236 So. 2d 108, 112 (Fla. 1970), gave this general definition of work product saying what it is and what it is no

tic) -- purpose of the conversation with this officer. No answer, yet he's listed on the witness list at this time. Then the conversation turns to Ken Jenne, former Sheriff who worked at RRA during the time in question. THE COURT: What page are you on? MS. HADDAD COLEMAN: I'm at the top of page 15. S

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 -- the case had basically not been actively prosecuted in this court until June 2017 when the Florida Supreme Court issued its final ruling. So should the Court grant our motion, we did preserve the right to redepose Mr. Edwards on these issues. We feel not onl

of investigators used in the prosecution of the Epstein Actions. Those investigators included, but were not limited to Michael Fisten ("Fisten") and Ken Jenne, ("Jenne"), employees of RRA. Fisten and Jenne were the primary investigators assigned to Edwards and to whom they reported to conduct their investi

se in midst of the collapse of a firm in which he was a member, called Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler, P.A. ("RRA"). 4. Rothstein was disbarred by the Florida Supreme Court on November 20, 2009. Subsequently, Rothstein was arrested, arraigned in federal court, pled guilty and ultimately was sentenced to fifty (50) year