Epstein Secrets

[email protected] Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80811 Jack Scarola, Esq. [email protected] Jack Hill, Esq. [email protected] Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80811 Brad Edwards, Esq. [email protected] Counsel for Plaintiff in R

LORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80994-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 6, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPS

20hr $360.00 04/01/2009 RHB Draft letters to Mermelstein • tax returns - (JD No.5-7) 0.30hr $90.00 04/01/2009 RHB Telephone call to Attorney Jack Hill (CMA) regarding Rule 7.1; conference to work out discovery Issues 0.30hr $90.00 04/01/2009 RHB Draft Motions (2) to Compel directed to 1st Requ

; Doe II - Clerk's Notice of Reassignment 04/13/2009 RDC Receipt and review Doe ll's offer of settlement 04/13/2009 MJP Review and analysis of Jane Doe's Response in Opposition to Motion to Slay 04/14/2009 RDC E-mails; review motions/responses re: Pacer on #2-7; Response to Stay 04/14/2009 RDC Co

above cause. (Discussion held off the record.) MR. CRITTON: Let's get started. MR. EDWARDS: Brad Edwards, and I represent Jane Doe. ' MR. HILL: Jack Hill, on behalf (AM. MR. HOROWITZ: Adam Horowitz, on behalf of Jane Does 2 through 8. MR. LANGINO: Adam Langino, on behalf of B.B. MR. CRITTON: Bob Cr

d Mr. Hill's ellen ., will be referred to as , because how 11 that's 12 we referred to her, and she has -- she gave up 13 anonymity. 14 Jane Doe's 2 through 8, we may use their real 15 names, and then we'll just use, if it's 16 Sally Jones, it would be S.J. And then what you do 17 is, is o