Epstein Secrets

, FL 33301-3268 Expected to testify as to Edwards's lack of damages; and regarding the Epstein Cases while they were being prosecuted at RRA. 12. Denis Kleinfeld Mentioned in various RRA documents, including the privilege log filed in this case, he is expected to testify regarding "Epstein Cases" related mee

lvd., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-4639 Depending on the testimony of witnesses and evidence presented by Edwards in his case in chief, Mr. Critton may be asked to testify as to the information about which he and his client, Jeffrey Epstein, were aware and upon which they relied in filing suit a

privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;protected by privacy rights 13419 08/11/2009 Denis Kleinfeld Bradley Edwards Trump's Depo Work Product;attorney client privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admiss

ed to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights O4207-04215 09/04/2009 Attorneys at RRA Paul Cassell Letter to Critton RE: Protective Order W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; pr

irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 13413-13414 08/06/2009 Denis Kleinfeld Bradley Edwards Epstein information Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discover

Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards. Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION 02331-02334 05/08/2009 Susan Stirling Bradley Edwards Critton order Transcript Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible e

privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;protected by privacy rights 13419 08/11/2009 Denis Kleinfeld Bradley Edwards Trump's Depo Work Productattorney client privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissi

ed to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 04207-04215 09/04/2009 Attorneys at RRA Paul Cassell Letter to Critton RE: Protective W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and Order not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; pro

irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 13413.13414 08/06/2009 Denis Kleinfeld Bradley Edwards Epstein information Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discover

Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION 02331-02334 05/08/2009 Susan Stirling Bradley Edwards Critton order Transcript Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible e