Epstein Secrets

ted 2-23-2011 Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION 01029 10/08/2009 Bradley Edwards Carolyn Edwards Brian Ryalls Joint W/P Priv. 07707 09/03/2009 Brad leyEdwards Kikka Claudio RE:Regarding:C.M.A. vs. Epstein. Et al.(File# 281849) Joint W/P

/02/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Meeting w/Stanley Arkin Joint W/P Priv. 06861-06863 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06876.06879 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Stuart Mermelstein RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06891-06897 05/

irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 03669-03670 10/08/2009 Carolyn Edwards Bradley Edwards Epstein house arrest monitor Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the

ted to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02411-02413 05/12/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley J. Edwards Jane Doe II v. Epstein Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidenc

ted 2-23-2011 Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION 01029 10/08/2009 Bradley Edwards Carolyn Edwards Brian Ryalls Joint W/P Priv. 07707 09/03/2009 BradleyEdwards Kikka Claudio RE:Regarding:C.M.A. vs. Epstein. Et al.(File# 281849) Joint W/P P

/02/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Meeting w/Stanley Arkin Joint W/P Priv. 06861-06863 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06876-06879 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Stuart Mermelstein RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06891-06897 05/

irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 03669-03670 10/08/2009 Carolyn Edwards Bradley Edwards Epstein house arrest monitor Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the

ted to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02411-02413 05/12/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley J. Edwards Jane Doe II v. Epstein Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidenc