Epstein Secrets

n Paul Cassell 383 S. University Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730 [email protected] Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel fora., E. It". and Jane Doe Jay Howell Jay Howell & Associates 644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250 Jacksonville, FL 32211 Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel forM., E.W. and Jane Doe 5 EFTA008084

expert which is otherwise qualified to testify to what he's going to testify. (3/8/18 Aft. Tr. 93:16-20.) Indeed, "[a]s indicated in Binger v. King Pest Control, 401 So. 2d 1310 (Fla. 1981), the exclusion of an unlisted witness' testimony is a drastic remedy which should pertain in only the most compelling

efendant Jeffrey Epstein Paul Cassell 383 S. University St. Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730 Limited Intervenor a -Counsel for E.W. and Jane Doe Jay Howell Jay Howell & Associates 644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250 Jacksonville, FL 32211 Limited Intervenor a -Counsel for n, E.W. and Jane Doe 10 EFTA00808

l by way of memorandum, and that will be done under seal and will continue to be under seal, and will be filed under seal in case of Ringer v. King Pest Control, 401 So. 2d 1310 (Fla. 1981). 2 EFTA00808705 a need for appellate review. So that is going to be the direction of the Court, that the motion be

ldberger Atterb , Goldber er & Weiss, P.A. o- ounse or aint:I oimter- e endant Je E•stein unite ntervenor o- ounse or L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe Jay Howell Jay Howell & Associates L.M., E.W. Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for and Jane Doe 21 EFTA00794297

Link & Rockenbach, PA discovered documents that were voluntarily produced years ago by Edwards to his potential adversaries at the 6Binger v. King Pest Control, 401 So. 2d 1310 (Fla. 1981). 3 EFTA00794279 time — the Razorback plaintiffs. These e-mails directly contradict Edwards' sworn testimony and pos

aul Cassell 383 S. University St. Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730 cassellpalaw.utah.edu Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe Jay Howell Jay Howell & Associates 644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250 Jacksonville, FL 32211 iay(ajavhowell.com Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and

that any substantive discussion of those emails will be done under seal by way of memorandum, and that will be done under seal and 'Binger v. King Pest Control, 401 So. 2d 1310 (Fla. 1981). 2Excerpts of the November 2, 2018, Hearing Transcript are attached as Exhibit A. 2 EFTA00794299 will continue to b