Epstein Secrets

FFICE OF BRAD EDWARDS & ASSOCIATES, LLC Attorneys for Plaintiff 2028 Harrison Street Suite 202 Hollywood, Florida 33020 Telephone: Facsimile: Jay Howell, Esquire Florida Bar #225657 JAY HOWELL & ASSOCIATES, P.A. Co-Counsel for Plaintiff 644 Cesery Boulevard Suite 250 Jacksonville, Florida 32211

r v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1209 (11th Cir. 1981) (en banc), the Eleventh Circuit adopted as binding precedent all decisions of the former Fifth Circuit handed down prior to October 1, 1981). 24 EFTA00799518 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 205-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2013 Page 26 of 101

triable as of right by a jury. DATED this 10th day of $evtember, 2008. THE LAW OFFICE OF BRAD EDWARDS & ASSOCIATES, LLC Attorneys for Plaintiff Jay Howell, Esquire Florida Bar #225657 JAY HOWELL & ASSOCIATES, P.A. Co-Counsel for Plaintiff STATEN FLORIDA • PALM BEACH COUNTY I hereby et..ity that the

r v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1209 (11th Cir. 1981) (en banc), the Eleventh Circuit adopted as binding precedent all decisions of the former Fifth Circuit handed down prior to October 1, 1981). 24 EFTA00795194 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 205-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2013 Page 26 of 101

OCIATES, LLC Attorneys for Plaintiff 2028 Harrison Street Suite 202 Hollywood, Florida 33020 Telephone: 954-414-8033 Facsimile: 954-924-1530 Jay Howell, Esquire Florida Bar #225657 JAY HOWELL & ASSOCIATES, P.A. Co-Counsel for Plaintiff 644 Cesery Boulevard Suite 250 Jacksonville, Florida 32211

r v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1209 (11th Cir. 1981) (en banc), the Eleventh Circuit adopted as binding precedent all decisions of the former Fifth Circuit handed down prior to October 1, 1981). 24 EFTA00081039 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 205-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2013 Page 26 of 101

FFICE OF BRAD EDWARDS & ASSOCIATES, LLC Attorneys for Plaintiff 2028 Harrison Street Suite 202 Hollywood, Florida 33020 Telephone: Facsimile: Jay Howell, Esquire Florida Bia s JAY HO SOCIATES, PA. Co-Counsel for Plaintiff 644 Cesery Boulevard Suite 250 Jacksonville, Florida 32211 Telephone: Fa

r v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1209 (11th Cir. 1981) (en banc), the Eleventh Circuit adopted as binding precedent all decisions of the former Fifth Circuit handed down prior to October 1, 1981). 24 EFTA00208846 The remedy of "apology" is not cognizable, either within the meaning of the CVRA or as a

Partner, Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman (Fort Lauderdale, Fla.). The authors thank Douglas Beloof, Patricia Cassell, Meg Garvin, Jay Howell, James Marsh, and Stephen Twist for their assistance with this Article. 59 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014038 --- PAGE BREAK --- 60 CASSELL ET AL. [Vol. 104

in. The Fifth Circuit then remanded the matter to the district court to determine the appropriate remedy for the violation of the victims’ rights.° The Fifth Circuit’s decision in Dean has been cited favorably in four recent district court decisions, which provides further support for the conclusion that the CVRA ap

e leading case to date to assess this question is the Fifth Circuit's decision in In re Dean. °° There, a wealthy corpo

Partner, Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman (Fort Lauderdale, Fla.). The authors thank Douglas Beloof, Patricia Cassell, Meg Garvin, Jay Howell, James Marsh, and Stephen Twist for their assistance with this Article. Highlight This Article addresses whether crime victims should have rights d