Epstein Secrets

participants who worked on the "Epstein Cases" while they were being prosecuted by RRA, his work on the "Epstein Cases" and the Ponzi scheme. 13. Carl Linder Linder Law Group 175 SW 7'h Street, Suite 2410 Miami, FL 33130-2966 Mentioned in various RRA documents, including the privilege log filed in this

lvd., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-4639 Depending on the testimony of witnesses and evidence presented by Edwards in his case in chief, Mr. Critton may be asked to testify as to the information about which he and his client, Jeffrey Epstein, were aware and upon which they relied in filing suit a

vilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;protected by privacy rights 12281-12291 07/30/2009 Carl Linder Bradley Edwards Litigation Strategy Work Product;attorney client privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of

ed to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights O4207-04215 09/04/2009 Attorneys at RRA Paul Cassell Letter to Critton RE: Protective Order W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; pr

ege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 12569 07/30/2009 Carl Linder Bradley Edwards Epstein Sex Abuse Litigation Forum Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead

Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards. Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION 02331-02334 05/08/2009 Susan Stirling Bradley Edwards Critton order Transcript Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible e

privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;protected by privacy rights 11983 08/06/2009 Carl Linder Jacquie Johnson Litigation Strategy Work Product;attorney client privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of

ed to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 04207-04215 09/04/2009 Attorneys at RRA Paul Cassell Letter to Critton RE: Protective W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and Order not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; pro

ege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 12569 07/30/2009 Carl Linder Bradley Edwards Epstein Sex Abuse Litigation Forum Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to le

Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION 02331-02334 05/08/2009 Susan Stirling Bradley Edwards Critton order Transcript Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible e