Epstein Secrets

levant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;protected by privacy rights 25738 08/03/2009 William Berger Beth Williamson Litigation Strategy Work Product;attorney client privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evid

edes C. Estrada Doe v. Epstein Joint-privilege 02044 09/04/2009 Katherine W. Ezell Bradley J. Edwards E.W., Doe v. Epstein — Letter from Bob Critton Joint-privilege 02048 09/04/2009 Robert C. Josefsberg Bradley J. Edwards E.W., Doe v. Epstein — Letter from Bob Critton Joint-privilege 0

irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02548-02553 08/03/2009 Beth Williamson Bradley Edwards Federal Subpoena Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery o

issible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02045-02046 09/04/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley J. Edwards E.W., Doe v. Epstein — Letter from Bob Critton Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protect

levant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;protected by privacy rights 25738 08/03/2009 William Berger Beth Williamson Litigation Strategy Work Product;attorney client privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evid

. Estrada Doe v. Epstein Joint-privilege 02044 09/04/2009 Katherine W. Ezell Bradley J. Edwards Doe v. Epstein — Joint-privilege e er r m Bob Critton 02048 09/04/2009 Robert C. Josefsberg Bradley J. Edwards Doe v. Epstein — Joint-privilege Letter from Bob Critton 02054 05/12/2009 Spence

irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02548-02553 08/03/2009 Beth Williamson Bradley Edwards Federal Subpoena Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery o

ble evidence; protected by privacy rights 02045.02046 09/04/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley J. Edwards E.W., L.M. Doe v. Epstein — Letter from Bob Critton Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protect

She's your current secretary/paralegal, or 2 do you have a secretary as well? 3 A. I don't understand your question. 4 Q. Do you have -- is Beth Williamson your 5 paralegal? 6 A. She's a paralegal at the law firm of Farmer, 7 Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman. 8 Q. Does she primarily w

ting 21 Agency. 22 Will counsel please introduce 23 yourselves, and then the court reporter 24 will swear in the witnesses. 25 MR. CRITTON: Bob Critton on behalf of the PROSE COURT REPORTING AGENCY, INC. EFTA00599665 Page 5 Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein. MR. GOLDBERG: Jack Goldberger on behalf of