Epstein Secrets

levant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;protected by privacy rights 25738 08/03/2009 William Berger Beth Williamson Litigation Strategy Work Product;attorney client privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evid

/02/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Meeting w/Stanley Arkin Joint W/P Priv. 06861-06863 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06876.06879 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Stuart Mermelstein RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06891-06897 05/

irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02548-02553 08/03/2009 Beth Williamson Bradley Edwards Federal Subpoena Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery o

ted to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02411-02413 05/12/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley J. Edwards Jane Doe II v. Epstein Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidenc

levant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;protected by privacy rights 25738 08/03/2009 William Berger Beth Williamson Litigation Strategy Work Product;attorney client privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evid

/02/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Meeting w/Stanley Arkin Joint W/P Priv. 06861-06863 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06876-06879 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Stuart Mermelstein RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06891-06897 05/

irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02548-02553 08/03/2009 Beth Williamson Bradley Edwards Federal Subpoena Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery o

ted to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02411-02413 05/12/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley J. Edwards Jane Doe II v. Epstein Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidenc