Epstein Secrets

quite answer. A: Just because of the way I knew Brad and socialized with him, I did not know that he was at that level. There are certain people, Barry Stone, second he found out about it would have absolutely done what was appropriately- supposed to do from an ethical standpoint. And then there were pe

ge female plaintiff. To augment his concocted story, Rothstein invited D3 to his office to view the thirteen banker's boxes of actual case files in Jane Doe in order to demonstrate that the claims against Epstein were legitimate and that the evidence against Epstein was real. In particular, Rothstein cla

unty and the Treasure • Coast. I was invited ono simmer to sit on -- to 10 sit on that court in place of a judge who was on 11 vacation, Judge Barry Stone. So I served on the 12 Fourth District and served with a panel of judges 13 and heard quite a number of cafes and wrote several 14 decisions fo

riod and say, You 25 know, I should have realized there was something that were being prosecuted on behalf of throe young 1 woman: M., B.N. and Jane Doe. And w➢ will refer to them when I talk to you about them in that ➢ame way, 4 referring to sham by those initial➢ and that 5 pseudonym. 4 Desc

t quite answer. A Just because of the way I knew Brad and socialized with him, 1 did not know that he was at that level. There are certain people, Barry Stone, second he found out about it would have absolutely done what was appropriately- supposed to do from an ethical standpoint. And then there were pe

lleged the following: In fact, RRA did have inside information due to its representation of one of Epstein's alleged victims in a civil case styled Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, pending in the Southern District of Florida. Representatives of D3 were offered Tonja Haddad?... • 315 SE 7th Street, Fort L

ge 04220- 04221 09/04/2009 Bradley Edwards Spencer Kuvin Letter from Bob Critton Joint W/P Privilege 04222.04223 09/04/2009 Bradley Edwards Barry Stone Letter from Bob Critton Joint W/P Privilege 21 EFTA00602855 Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman

97 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06901 09/11/2009 Bradley Edwards Mercedes Estrada Re:Jane Doe No. 101 & Jane Doe No. 102 vs. Epstein-Cross Notice Of Depos Joint W/P Priv. 06902 09/15/2009 Bradley Edwards Mercedes Estrada RE: Jane Doe N

ge 04220— 04221 09/04/2009 Bradley Edwards Spencer Kuvin Letter from Bob Critton Joint W/P Privilege 04222.04223 09/04/2009 Bradley Edwards Barry Stone Letter from Bob Critton Joint W/P Privilege 21 EFTA00310068 Privilege Log — Dated 2-2 3-201 1 Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrm

ted to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;protected by privacy rights 01080-01081 06/22/2009 Robert C. Buschel Bradley J. Edwards Jane Doe brother Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product 01077 05/28/2009 Robert C. Buschel Bradley J. Edwards Doe family member Attorney/Client p

om for as many attorneys as possible to attend a meeting on October 23, 2009 on the Epstein Actions. The email requested that Jenne, Adler, Berger, Barry Stone, Mike Wheeler, Cara Holmes, Rob Buschel, Fisten, Steve Jaffe, and Nurik attend; b) Nurik emailed Edwards about the meeting; c) Edwards sent an e

Ponzi scheme, RRA was also engaged in litigation against Epstein in three civil cases. The cases were Jane Doe v. Epstein, Case No. 08-CIV- 80893 ("Jane Doe"), U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida; L.M. v. Epstein ("LM"), Case No. 50-2008 CA 028051XXXXMB-AB; and E.W. v. Epstein ("EW" or "Jan

om for as many attorneys as possible to attend a meeting on October 23, 2009 on the Epstein Actions. The email requested that Jenne, Adler, Berger, Barry Stone, Mike Wheeler, Cara Holmes, Rob Buschel, Fisten, Steve Jaffe, and Nurik attend; b) Nurik emailed Edwards about the meeting; c) Edwards sent an e

Ponzi scheme, RRA was also engaged in litigation against Epstein in three civil cases. The cases were Jane Doe v. Epstein, Case No. 08-CIV- 80893 ("Jane Doe"), U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida; L.M. v. Epstein ("LM"), Case No. 50-2008 CA 028051XXXXMB-AB; and E.W. v. Epstein ("EW" or "Jan