Epstein Secrets

t and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02746 07/22/2009 Bradley Edwards Adam Steinberg Litigation Strategy W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; pr

/02/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Meeting w/Stanley Arkin Joint W/P Priv. 06861-06863 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06876.06879 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Stuart Mermelstein RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06891-06897 05/

vilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02746 07/22/2009 Adam Steinberg Litigation Strategy W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; pr

not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02411-02413 05/12/2009 Attorneys at I Jane Doe II v. Epstein Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidenc

t and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02746 07/22/2009 Bradley Edwards Adam Steinberg Litigation Strategy W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; pr

/02/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Meeting w/Stanley Arkin Joint W/P Priv. 06861-06863 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06876-06879 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Stuart Mermelstein RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06891-06897 05/