Epstein Secrets

egarding Certain Correspondence Obtained By Jane Doe's attorneys during discovery, and each state: I. In July 2010, the law firm of Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos and Lehrman, PL. (the "Law Finn"), Paul G. Cassell, Esq. and Jay Howell, Esq. ("Counsel") received through discovery certain corre

the above-styled matter and in the matters of L,M. vs. Epstein, CASE NO. 502008 CA028051 JODOCMB AB and E.W. vs. Epstein, CASE NO. 502008 CA028058 XXXXMB AB, Counsel may wish to use the Correspondence in pending cases of Epstein v, Rothstein, CASE NO. 502009CA040800/OOOCMB AO and In Re: Jane Does 1 and 2

egarding Certain Correspondence Obtained By Jane Doe's attorneys during discovery, and each state: I. In July 2010, the law firm of Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos and Lehrman, PL. (the "Law Finn"), Paul G. Cassell, Esq. and Jay Howell, Esq. ("Counsel") received through discovery certain corre

the above-styled matter and in the matters of L,M. vs. Epstein, CASE NO. 502008 CA028051 JODOCMB AB and E.W. vs. Epstein, CASE NO. 502008 CA028058 XXXXMB AB, Counsel may wish to use the Correspondence in pending cases of Epstein v, Rothstein, CASE NO. 502009CA040800/OOOCMB AO and In Re: Jane Does 1 and 2

egarding Certain Correspondence Obtained By Jane Doe's attorneys during discovery, and each state: I. In July 2010, the law firm of Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos and Lehrman, PL. (the "Law Finn"), Paul G. Cassell, Esq. and Jay Howell, Esq. ("Counsel") received through discovery certain corre

the above-styled matter and in the matters of L,M. vs. Epstein, CASE NO. 502008 CA028051 JODOCMB AB and E.W. vs. Epstein, CASE NO. 502008 CA028058 XXXXMB AB, Counsel may wish to use the Correspondence in pending cases of Epstein v, Rothstein, CASE NO. 502009CA040800/OOOCMB AO and In Re: Jane Does 1 and 2