Epstein Secrets

ICE LIST M.J. v. Epstein Case No. 9:10-cv-81111-WPD United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Bradley J. Edwards Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards Fistos & Lehrman, PL Telephone: Facsimile: Attorneys for Plaintiff M.J. Served via CMIECF -14- EFTA00725489

proof of service from Mr. Marsigliano attesting that he left M.J.'s complaint with the caretaker at Epstein's residence or usual place of abode." (D.E. 15 at p. II). This assertion is false. Defendant has never admitted that the proof of service states that Mr. Marsigliano left the Summons and Com

copy of her complaint and other documents with someone at the home", which is all that Plaintiff alleges, or whether Mr. Epstein had actual notice (D.E. 15 at 12), but, rather, whether the suit papers were left with "someone of suitable age and discretion who resides" at 9 East 71s' Street, New York.

d States, Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah Attorneys for Jane Doe # I and Jane Doe #

n letter to me. This was the first written communication I had received from the FBI. The letter was attached as Exhibit 1 to my earlier statement." D.E. 310- 1, 1 34. Exhibit 1 to her earlier statement of January 19, 2015 (D.E. 291-1), is the notification letter from the United States Attorney's Offi

on June 30, 2008, in the Circuit Court for Palm Beach County to various similar state offenses including solicitation of minors for prostitution." D.E. 1,1 2. Once they received the non-prosecution Jane Doe No. 3, who seeks to be added as a party, also wasted little time in utilizing the non- prosec

rch, 2010: Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein Brad Edwards, Esq. Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, PL ounse or ant in e a e ase No. 084089-3 Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hac Vice EFTA00207708 Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM

retrial motions by the parties is March 5, 2010. This action is currently set for trial on the two week calendar commencing Monday, July 16, 2010. [D.E. 119]. Thus, in order to comply with the Court's order, Defendant is filing the subject motion now. As stated above, Defendant requests and reserves

d States, Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, 4.74 Ninrih A tin* c AN / Paul G. Cassell Quinney College of Law at the Attorneys for Jane Doe # 1 and Jane Doe # 2

n letter to me. This was the first written communication I had received from the FBI. The letter was attached as Exhibit 1 to my earlier statement." D.E. 310- 1, ¶ 34. Exhibit 1 to her earlier statement of January 19, 2015 (D.E. 291-1), is the notification letter from the United States Attorney's Offi

d States, Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. Paul G. Cassell 20 EFTA00210639 C! tin" 1- • Attorneys for Jane Doe # 1 and Jane Doe # 2 Roy Black Jackie P

FBI's investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. She told S/A Slater that she did not want to be bothered about the Epstein matter again. D.E. 304-1, ¶ 7 and D.E. 290-3 at 17-18. In their motion, petitioners claim that the facts surrounding this exchange are highly disputed, when they are not. D.E. 311 at 16

d States, Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. 13 EFTA00210906 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 290 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/20/2015 Page 14 of 14 Paul G. Cas

ates: I. PETITIONERS' MOTION TO ADD TWO ADDITIONAL PARTIES SHOULD BE DENIED AS UNTIMELY This action was commenced by Jane Doe #1 on July 7, 2008 (D.E. I). The Court ordered the Government to file a response by July 9, 2008, which was done. On July 11, 2008, the Court held a hearing on the emergenc

. 10681 and to Compel Jeffrey Epstein to Pay for the Production of All Documents in Response to his Requests filed by Interested Party Farmer, Jafe, Weissing, Edwards, Fixtos & Lehrman, P.L [D.E. 1194] (the "Agreed Order"). The Agreed Order [D.E. 1194] stated that: Fowler White will not retain any copies

urt orders or rules, or to prevent an abuse of process. The Court has jurisdiction here because the Court retained jurisdiction in the Agreed Order [D.E. 1194], and this alleged discovery violation is a core proceeding. See 28 U.S.C. § 157 ("Core proceedings include, but are not limited to (A) matter

ckenbach"), which occurred on October 13, 2018. Due to the impermissible questions, Epstein additionally moves this Court to require Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. ("Farmer Jaffe"), Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards") and Intervenor L.M. ("L.M.") (collectively, the "Movants") to pay

uly 20, July 25 and September 26, 2018, Edwards filed Notices of Taking Link & Rockenbach's deposition duces tecum. (D.E. 6390; D.E. 6391; D.E. MOO; D.E. 6406; D.E. 6468.) Epstein filed his Responses and Objections on July 20 and October 4, 2018. (D.E. 6402; 6478.) In his Response, Epstein objected t

specified via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF on this day of November, 2010. Brad Edwards, Esq. Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman PL Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Aueroury uotaneriter K weirs, r., FOWLER WHITE BURNER, PA -8- EFTA00235284 Case 9:08-

note from a review of the docket sheet in Doe v. U.S., that Judge Marra administratively closed the cases for non-prosecution on September 9, 2010 [D.E. 39]. Please recall the undersigned pointed out in Epstein's initial motion that this case has been languishing in excess -6- FOWLER WHITE BURNETT.