Epstein Secrets

iltes 'finis 1. Karotin on oltrednor American Rapresx Travel Rallike, Services Company. Inc Seth Lehmun oa behalf of Intertstal Party Farmer, Jale, Weissing, Edwards, Finos 6. Lehniumill. mieMei D Ltir behalf_ofDdldmIt Marevi Lmeman https://ecEflsb.uscourts.govicgi-biti/Dispatch.pl?57 1963140018278 3/

th LLC Bruce H Lehr on behalf of Defendant Stuart Rosenfeldt • • f oftretlitor White Oak 0 kabal Advisors LLC • f of Creditor Todd Snyder 1 1 Luzinski Camilo Mutrique c/o Marianella Morales • ' de Kra Ric :4,1() https://ecf.flsb.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispateh.pl?571963 140018278 3/25/2011 EF

EDWARDS. FISTOS & LEHRMAN. P.L TO CREDITORS MOTION TO CLARIFY PRIOR ORDERS (a minor victim of sex offenses), Bradley J. Edwards, and Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. (hereinafter referred to collectively as ) file this response to the Motion to Clarify Prior Orders (doc. #1554)

. Indeed, the obligation to produce a privilege log is not even triggered until there has been an initial determination of relevancy. See Gosman v. Luzinski, 937 So.2d 293, 296 (Fla. App. 2006) ("Before a written objection to a request for production of documents is ruled upon, the documents are not 'ot

LIST Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Attorney For: Jeffr West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: Fax: Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman. PL Fort La • FL 33301 Pho c: Fax: Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik 1 Rothstein Fort Lauderdale

exceed the scope. The Court must rule on the objections and the scope of discovery before Defendant has any duty to file a privilege log. Gosman v. Luzinski, 937 So.2d 293, 296 (4th DCA 2006). "A party is required to file a log only if the information is `otherwise discoverable!" Gosman at 296 (referri

er & Weiss, M . Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phon Fax: e(M. Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehnnan, PI, 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 PFax ho:n=. Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S.

exceed the scope. The Court must rule on the objections and the scope of discovery before Defendant has any duty to file a privilege log. Gosman v. Luzinski, 937 So.2d 293, 296 (4th DCA 2006). "A party is required to file a log only if the information is `otherwise discoverable!" Gosman at 296 (referri