Epstein Secrets

Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION 08076.08089 08/04/2009 Bradley Edwards Spencer Kuvin Transcript of Alfr

08/06/2009 Adam Horowitz Bradley J. Edwards Epsteins assets Joint-privilege 16 EFTA00602850 Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 Farmer. Jaffe. Weissing. Edwards. Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION 03243.03244 09/09/2009 Bradley J. Edwards Adam Horowitz EPSTEIN Join

/02/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Meeting w/Stanley Arkin Joint W/P Priv. 06861-06863 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06876.06879 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Stuart Mermelstein RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06891-06897 05/

&T Dial in Telephone Conference for Monday, 6/8/09 at 2:00 p.m. Joint-privilege 20 EFTA00310067 Privilege Log— Dated 2-23-2011 Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing. Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION 01188 05/12/2009 Bradley J. Edwards Mercedes C. Estrada Epstein —

E, WEISSING, EDWARDS. FISTOS & LEHRMAN Dated: February 23, 2011 Total of 159 pages EFTA00310047 Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION 08076-08089 08/04/2009 Bradley Edwards 1 Spencer Kuvin Transcript of Alf

/02/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Meeting w/Stanley Arkin Joint W/P Priv. 06861-06863 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06876-06879 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Stuart Mermelstein RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06891-06897 05/

et al. West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Gary M. Farmer, Jr. Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards Fistos & Lehrman P.L. Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 AROLA Flori ar No.: SER CE LIST 24 EFTA00725992 DEFENDANT BRADLEY J. EDWARDS'S MO

, 08-80802), . (Case No.08-80811), Jane Does Nos. 101, 102 and 103 (Case Nos. 09-80591, 09-80656, 10-80309), another Jane Doe (Case No. 08-80804), Jane Doe II (Case No. 09-80469), as well as other non-filed claims. Furthermore, Defendant has also resolved three state court claims. The only cases not resolv

rch, 2010: Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein Brad Edwards, Esq. Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, PL ounse or ant in e a e ase No. 084089-3 Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hac Vice EFTA00207708 Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM

operty preserve all issues pertaining to the proper application of §2255 for appeal. See C.MA. v. Epstein, Case No. 08-CIV-80811 Marra/Johnson; and Jane Doe II v. Epstein, Case No. 09-CW-80489 Marra/Johnson. EFTA00207698 Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 03 05 2010 Page 23 of 36

communicate, asserting, mansion, blanket COUNSEL: [1] For Jane Doe, No. 2, Plaintiff (9:08cv80119): Adam D. Horowitz, LEAD ATTORNEY, Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos, Lehrman, P.L., Fort Lauderdale, FL USA; Jeffrey Marc Herman, LEAD ATTORNEY, Herman & Mermelstein, Miami, FL USA; Stuart S. Mermel

ell, LEAD ATTORNEY. Podhurst Orseck Josefsberg et al, Miami, FL USA; Robert C. Josefsberg, LEAD ATTORNEY, Podhurst Orseck, P.A., Miami, FL USA. For Jane Doe II, Consol Plaintiff (9:08cv80119): Isidro Manuel Garcia, LEAD ATTORNEY, The Garcia Law Firm, P.A., West Palm Beach, FL USA. For Jane Doe No. 6, Jane

, LEAD ATTORNEY, Herman Law, Boca Raton, FL USA. For Jane Doe No. 6, Plaintiff (9:08-cv-80994-KAM): Adam D. Horowitz, LEAD ATTORNEY, Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos, Lehrman, P.L., Fort Lauderdale, FL USA; Jeffrey Marc Herman, LEAD ATTORNEY, Herman & Mermelstein, Miami, FL USA; Stuart S. Mermel

; Joseph Laurence Ackerman, Jr., Fowler White Burnett, P.A., West Palm Beach, FL; Michael James Pike, Pike & Lustig, LLP, West Palm Beach, FL. For Jane Doe II, Plaintiff (9:09-cv-80469-KAM): Bradley James Edwards, LEAD ATTORNEY, Edwards Pottinger LLC, Fort Lauderdale, FL; Isidro Manuel Garcia, LEAD ATTORN

, LEAD ATTORNEY, Herman Law, Boca Raton, FL USA. For Jane Doe No. 6, Plaintiff (9:08-cv-80994-KAM): Adam D. Horowitz, LEAD ATTORNEY, Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos, Lehrman, P.L., Fort Lauderdale, FL USA; Jeffrey Marc Herman, LEAD ATTORNEY, Herman & Mermelstein, Miami, FL USA; Stuart S. Mermel

; Joseph Laurence Ackerman, Jr., Fowler White Burnett, P.A., West Palm Beach, FL; Michael James Pike, Pike & Lustig, LLP, West Palm Beach, FL. For Jane Doe II, Plaintiff (9:09-cv-80469-KAM): Bradley James Edwards, LEAD ATTORNEY, Edwards Pottinger LLC, Fort Lauderdale, FL; Isidro Manuel Garcia, LEAD ATTORN

communicate, asserting, mansion, blanket COUNSEL: [1] For Jane Doe, No. 2, Plaintiff (9:08cv80119): Adam D. Horowitz, LEAD ATTORNEY, Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos, Lehrman, P.L., Fort Lauderdale, FL USA; Jeffrey Marc Herman, LEAD ATTORNEY, Herman & Mermelstein, Miami, FL USA; Stuart S. Mermel

ell, LEAD ATTORNEY. Podhurst Orseck Josefsberg et al, Miami, FL USA; Robert C. Josefsberg, LEAD ATTORNEY, Podhurst Orseck, P.A., Miami, FL USA. For Jane Doe II, Consol Plaintiff (9:08cv80119): Isidro Manuel Garcia, LEAD ATTORNEY, The Garcia Law Firm, P.A., West Palm Beach, FL USA. For Jane Doe No. 6, Jane

Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE 11Q FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible eviden

ted to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02411-02413 05/12/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley J. Edwards Jane Doe II v. Epstein Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidenc

Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION 03550-03574 09/09/2009 Attorneys at RRA Paul Cassell Litigation Strate

ted to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02411-02413 05/12/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley J. Edwards Jane Doe II v. Epstein Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidenc