Epstein Secrets

m B. King Searcy Denny Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Bradley J. Edwards Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. 425 N. Andrews Ave., Ste. 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Mark Nurik Philip M. Burlington Burlington & Rockenbach,

) 6, 9 Valdes v. GAB Robins, 924 So. 2d 862 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) 7 Volusia County v. Aberdeen at Ormond Beach, M., 760 So. 2d 126 (Fla. 2000) 2 Wolfe v. Foreman, 128 So. 3d 67 (FIa. 3d DCA 2013) passim Wright v. Yurko, 446 So. 2d 1162 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984) 19, 20, 21 iii EFTA00589620 PRELIMI

, Defendant. Case #: I :15-cv-07433 United States District Court Southern District of New York Law Firms: Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP and Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, . 2015 Testimony Deposition Report Plaintiff WICKFIRE, LLC, Plaintiff, v. TRIMAX MEDIA, INC., LAURA WOODRUFF, WRE

n the Web. In: Encyclopedia of Digital Government. Editors: Ari- Veikko Anttiroiko and Matti Malkia. p. 933-939. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing. Wolfe, R., Jansen, B.J., and Spink, A. (2006) Semantics and the medical Web: A review of barriers and breakthroughs in effective healthcare query. In: Adv

addad Coleman -18- EFTA00612500 W. Chester Brewer, Jr. W. Chester Brewer. Jr P.A. Tonja Haddad Coleman, P.A. Bradley J. Edwards Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fred Haddad Fred Haddad, P.A. Mark Nurik Law Offices of Mark S. Nurik Jack Goldberger Atterburv. Goldberger & Weiss. P.A. -19- EFTA0

use of process claims filed against Epstein by the appellant, Bradley J. Edwards. The trial judge relied in part upon the then binding precedent of Wolfe v. Foreman, 128 So. 3d 67 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) (holding that the litigation privilege applies to causes of action for malicious prosecution and abuse

ary 25, 2015: William B. King Searcy Denny Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. 3409 Bradley J. Edwards Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. 425 N. Andrews Ave., Ste. 2 Mark Nurik Law Offices of Mark S. Nurik 1 E. Broward Blvd., Ste. 700 Ft. Lauderdal

sconduct," we are obligated to conclude that the act complained of here -- the filing of the complaint — is protected by the litigation privilege. Wolfe v. Foreman, 128 So. 3d 67, 68 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) (emphasis added). Additionally, the Wolfe decision was recently cited with approval and relied upon