Epstein Secrets

IFIED CIVIL MAL LAWYEA aikomrrtto TO PRACTICE IN FIDIUDA AND Cotomoo June 28, 2010 Sent by E-Mail and U.S. Mail Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Re: Doe v. Epstein Dear Brad: ADELOYI I. BENA

r me in agreeing to authenticity, separate and apart from other objections that I am going to assert. In some instances, I have no problem, such as Milton records, Department of Juvenile Justice, Palm Beach School records, etc. Both you and I used categories and we know exactly what is in those docume

dber er et al. West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Gary M. Farmer, Jr. Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards Fistos & Lehrman P.L. Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 AROLA Flori ar No.: SER CE LIST 24 EFTA00725992 DEFENDANT BRADLEY J. ED

It is not enough for the opposing party merely to assert that an issue of fact does exist. Fisel v. Wynns, 667 So.2d 761, 764 (Fla.1996); Landers v. Milton, 370 So.2d 368, 370 (F1a.1979) (same). Moreover, it is well-recognized that the non-moving party faced with a summary judgment motion supported by

News (11/25, Reilly, Thorp V, et al.), Newsmax (11/25, Katz), NewsNation (11/25, Khalil, Noone), New York Post (11/25, King), New York Times (11/25, Jaffe), Newsweek (11/25, Silverman, Gooding), Politico (11/25, Wu), TMZ (11/25, Staff Writer), USA Today (11/25, Garrison), Wall Street Journal (11/25, Lu

, with arrests also made overseas in relation to the plot. How an Innocent Woman's Name Was Tied to the Jan. 6 Pipe Bombs CBS News (11/25, Jacobs, Milton, et al.) reported that a federal security officer was publicly and incorrectly linked to the Jan. 6 pipe bombs until she cleared her name with an al

scheme. At that time, I left RRA with several other RRA attorneys to form the law firm of Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos and Lehrman (“Farmer Jaffe”). I was thus with RRA for less than one year. 21. In July 2010, along with other attorneys at Farmer Jaffe and Professor Cassell, I reached favorab

1966), It is not enough for the —— party merely to assert that an issue of fact does exist. Fisel v. Wynns, 667 So.2d 761, 764 (Fla.1996); Landers v. Milton, 370 So.2d 368, 370 (Fla.1979) (same). | Moreover, it is well-recognized that the non-moving party faced with a summary judgment motion supported by