Epstein Secrets

7:6,7 13:13 14:8 26:16 30:18 33:19 44:18 45:11 61:2 81:21 93:23 98:18 99:25 102:2 111.18,19 112:24 114:11 J J 2:5 45:14 Jack 2:8,17 98:13 Jaffe 7:22 10:1,2,3,5 10:6 11:15 14:3,4 37:15 38:6,13 57:4 JAMES 2:12 Jane 2:11 22:18 65:9,20 74:14 Jansen 81:21,25 83:3,11,12,19 85:1 88:19 90:4

k at the Fowler White files. Then there's 24 THE COURT: That was the litigation lad by :4 a two-week delay between looking at the Fowler 25 Mr. Scherer. ,5 White files and receiving the disk. Md then Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 561-471-2995 EFTA00793837 17 19 I there's a tam-weak dela

114:6 114:12,15,24 115:8,20 116:18 117:6,9 118:1 119:15,24 Scarola's 36:9 scheduled 6:7 schedules 119:20 scheduling 43:22 scheme 17:9 95:9 Scherer 14:25 15:2 15:3,9,1018:18 18:20 19:2,11 Scope 3:12,17 score 94:1 I Scott 1:8 2:5 38:19 39:20 57:7 113:9 scrambling 73:4 screen 56:8 screenin

7:6,7 13:13 14:8 26:16 30:18 33:19 44:18 45:11 61:2 81:21 93:23 98:18 99:25 102:2 111.18,19 112:24 114:11 J J 2:5 45:14 Jack 2:8,17 98:13 Jaffe 7:22 10:1,2,3,5 10:6 11:15 14:3,4 37:15 38:6,13 57:4 JAMES 2:12 Jane 2:11 22:18 65:9,20 74:14 Jansen 81:21,25 83:3,11,12,19 85:1 88:19 90:4

k at the Fowler White files. Then there's 24 THE COURT: That was the litigation lad by :4 a two-week delay between looking at the Fowler 25 Mr. Scherer. ,5 White files and receiving the disk. Md then Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 561-471-2995 EFTA00793790 17 19 I there's a tam-weak dela

114:6 114:12,15,24 115:8,20 116:18 117:6,9 118:1 119:15,24 Scarola's 36:9 scheduled 6:7 schedules 119:20 scheduling 43:22 scheme 17:9 95:9 Scherer 14:25 15:2 15:3,9,1018:18 18:20 19:2,11 Scope 3:12,17 score 94:1 I Scott 1:8 2:5 38:19 39:20 57:7 113:9 scrambling 73:4 screen 56:8 screenin

ner specified via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF on this 2nd day of September, 2010. Brad Edwards, Esq. Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, PL -9- Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 'ICA A I ' A FoWLER WHITE BURNETT,

hat the Epstein case was a real case and ultimately invested money. A copy of the transcript of this hearing is attached hereto as Exhibit "3". Mr. Scherer's remarks appear on pages 17-22.2 On August 13, 2010, Bankruptcy Judge Raymond Ray ordered in response to a subpoena from Epstein the appointment of

ner specified via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF on this 2nd day of September, 2010. Brad Edwards, Esq. Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 423 N. Andrews Avenue Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 954-524-2820 954.524-2822 Fax BradQpathtoiust

hat the Epstein case was a real case and ultimately invested money. A copy of the transcript of this hearing is attached hereto as Exhibit "3". Mr. Scherer's remarks appear on pages 17-22.2 On August 13, 2010, Bankruptcy Judge Raymond Ray ordered in response to a subpoena from Epstein the appointment of

Tonja Haddad Coleman -18- EFTA00612500 W. Chester Brewer, Jr. W. Chester Brewer. Jr P.A. Tonja Haddad Coleman, P.A. Bradley J. Edwards Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fred Haddad Fred Haddad, P.A. Mark Nurik Law Offices of Mark S. Nurik Jack Goldberger Atterburv. Goldberger & Weiss. P.A.

Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W Rothstein, et al., Case No. 09-062943 ("Razorback Complaint"), on behalf of some of the Pont scheme investors. Mr. Scherer asserted the following in the Razorback Complaint at pages 16-17 regarding the Epstein cases: In certain instances, the purported settlements, albe

ner specified via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF on this 2nd day of September, 2010. Brad Edwards, Esq. Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 423 N. Andrews Avenue Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 -9- Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldb

hat the Epstein case was a real case and ultimately invested money. A copy of the transcript of this hearing is attached hereto as Exhibit "3". Mr. Scherer's remarks appear on pages 17-22.2 On August 13, 2010, Bankruptcy Judge Raymond Ray ordered in response to a subpoena from Epstein the appointment of

ase No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Edwards' Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment Page 12 of 15 reliance on public filings, including the Scherer Complaint against Rothstein is unavailing. As discussed above, the evidence warrants the finding that Epstein knew that Edwards was legitimately purs

scheme. At that time, I left RRA with several other RRA attorneys to form the law firm of Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos and Lehrman (“Farmer Jaffe”). I was thus with RRA for less than one year. 21. In July 2010, along with other attorneys at Farmer Jaffe and Professor Cassell, I reached favorab