Epstein Secrets

ged documents; and (iii) prepare a privilege log in accordance with standard practice and law." [DE 888]. 7. On September 20, 2010, Special Master Carney moved for clarification of this Court's order, suggesting that Farmer Jaffe be permitted the opportunity to review the documents themselves in orde

n v. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and LM., Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Palm Beach County, Florida Case No. 50-2009 CA 040800XXXX MB AG (hereinafter "the Epstein lawsuit"). 4. On April 17, 2010, Epstein served a subpoena in the Epstein lawsuit upon Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, PA ("

rs"). The Razorback Creditors' motion seeks to "clarify" that they have a right to "fully participate" in the process established by Special Master Carney for determining whether internal law firm e-mails and other records are protected by the attorney-client privilege. The motion, however, rests on t

leged that Rothstein had engaged in a fraud against him. Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and Case No. 50-2009 CA 040800XXXX MB AG (Cir. Ct. of the 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, FL). 24. and Edwards answered the complaint, denying all allegations against them and

collectively, the "Razorback Creditors"), file this Motion to Clarify this Court's prior Orders regarding the appointment and role of Special Master Carney in order to make clear the right of the Razorback Creditors, through counsel, to fully participate in the special master process put in place by th

18/11 Page 3 of 5 Scott Rothstein, individually, Bradley J. Edwards, individually and L.M., individually, bearing case number 50-2009 CA 040800XXXX MB AG. The subpoena was directed to the Trustee in this case as the Trustee had possession of the documents at issue. 4. On October 13, 2010, the Razorb