Epstein Secrets

protected from disclosure, this applies when "the manner and circumstances of the various techniques ... [are] not generally known to the public." Coleman v. FBI, 13 F. Supp. 2d 75, 83 (D.D.C. 1998); see also Shapiro v. Dep't of Justice, 249 F. Supp. 3d 502, 507 (D.D.C. 2017) ("Even though the identit

nforcement purposes" because they were created "in the exercise of BOP's statutory authority to detain arrested individuals." (Supplemental Decl. of Kara Christenson, ECF No. 39 [hereinafter "Christenson Supp. Decl."], at ¶ 29.) But this sweeping application of Exemption 7(A) would effectively shield every BOP r

protected from disclosure, this applies when "the manner and circumstances of the various techniques ... [are] not generally known to the public." Coleman v. FBI, 13 F. Supp. 2d 75, 83 (D.D.C. 1998); see also Shapiro v. Dep't of Justice, 249 F. Supp. 3d 502, 507 (D.D.C. 2017) ("Even though the identit

nforcement purposes" because they were created "in the exercise of BOP's statutory authority to detain arrested individuals." (Supplemental Decl. of Kara Christenson, ECF No. 39 [hereinafter "Christenson Supp. Decl."], at ¶ 29.) But this sweeping application of Exemption 7(A) would effectively shield every BOP r

protected from disclosure, this applies when "the manner and circumstances of the various techniques ... [are] not generally known to the public." Coleman v. FBI, 13 F. Supp. 2d 75, 83 (D.D.C. 1998); see also Shapiro v. Dep't of Justice, 249 F. Supp. 3d 502, 507 (D.D.C. 2017) ("Even though the identit

nforcement purposes" because they were created "in the exercise of BOP's statutory authority to detain arrested individuals." (Supplemental Decl. of Kara Christenson, ECF No. 39 [hereinafter "Christenson Supp. Decl."], at ¶ 29.) But this sweeping application of Exemption 7(A) would effectively shield every BOP r