Epstein Secrets

right and risk a potential criminal prosecution. Eastwood v. U.S., 2008 WL 5412857, *1 (E.D. Tenn.))("When

this action as set forth in St. Paul Fire and in Eastwood, including the similarity of issues underlying t

[email protected] Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #2 Jack Alan Goldberger Atterbury Goldberger &

rivilege and risk loosing this case by virtue of not being able to present evidence, or waive that right and risk a potential criminal prosecution. Eastwood v. U.S., 2008 WL 5412857, *1 (ED. Tenn.))("Vvien a party to a civil action is subject to criminal proceedings and/or investigations that relate to s

al discovery beyond the limits of Fed.R.Crim.Pro. 16(b). Epstein satisfies the requirements to stay this action as set forth in St. Paul Fire and in Eastwood, including the similarity of issues underlying the civil litigation and ongoing criminal investigation. As such, a stay should be entered in the ins

rights and participate in civil discovery in order to defend this civil action. Accordingly, Epstein adopts his arguments set forth in the Reply to Jane Doe's Response In Opposition filed in 08-CIV-80893 (DE 54) and incorporates same herein by reference. EFTA00201284 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 81

rivilege and risk loosing this case by virtue of not being able to present evidence, or waive that right and risk a potential criminal prosecution. Eastwood v. U.S. 2008 WL 5412857, *1 (E.D. Tenn.)X"When a party to a civil action is subject to criminal proceedings and/or investigations that relate to suc

al discovery beyond the limits of Fed.R.Crim.Pro. 16(b). Epstein satisfies the requirements to stay this action as set forth in St. Paul Fire and in Eastwood, including the similarity of issues underlying the civil litigation and ongoing criminal investigation. As such, a stay should be entered in the in

Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 54 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/12/2009 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 08-CIV- 80893 — MARRA/JOHNSON Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Reply to Plaintiff's Response

rivilege and risk loosing this case by virtue of not being able to present evidence, or waive that right and risk a potential criminal prosecution. Eastwood v, U.S., 2008 WL 5412857, *1 (E.D. Tenn.))("When a party to a civil action is subject to criminal proceedings and/or investigations that relate to s

al discovery beyond the limits of Fed.R.Crim.Pro. 16(b). Epstein satisfies the requirements to stay this action as set forth in St. Paul Fire and in Eastwood, including the similarity of issues underlying the civil litigation and ongoing criminal investigation. As such, a stay should be entered in the in

to Compel Response to 1st RTP and 1st Interrogs filed by . (Hill, Jack) (Entered: 04/20/2009) 04 /22%2009 63 r 313:: MOTION for Leave to File Jane Doe's No. 101's Motion For Leave to File Brief as Amicus Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs Response in Opposition to Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to

VESENAZ HOLDING CORP ELSON,EDWARD HEATHWOOD,DESMOND J BEYER,LAWRENCE WYCKKOFF,S

QUINN,OLIVER H LOCKER,NANCY OWEN,JANE D CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD KELLER,MICHAEL