Epstein Secrets

ved in the grand jury presentation, reviewing the fruits of the Government's investigation, or developing prosecutorial strategy); United States v. Collins, 409 F. Supp. 3d 228, 241-43 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) (no joint investigation between U.S. Attorney's Office and SEC where the two entities conducted a smal

(no joint investigation between Government, Public Company Accounting Oversight Board ("PCAOB") and Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") where PCAOB was not involved in witness interviews or developing prosecutorial strategy, and SEC was not involved in the grand jury presentation, reviewing the

ved in the grand jury presentation, reviewing the fruits of the Government's investigation, or developing prosecutorial strategy); United States v. Collins, 409 F. Supp. 3d 228, 241-43 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) (no joint investigation between U.S. Attorney's Office and SEC where the two entities conducted a smal

(no joint investigation between Government, Public Company Accounting Oversight Board ("PCAOB") and Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") where PCAOB was not involved in witness interviews or developing prosecutorial strategy, and SEC was not involved in the grand jury presentation, reviewing the

ve been reviewing materials from that other investigation to assess whether our victims were in fact involved in unlawful conduct. 2/3/20 U.S. v. Collins et al. 18 Cr. 567 (VSB) (USAO # 2017R01052) (Hartman/ Williams/Nicholas): Congressman Christopher Collins, his son Cameron Collins, and his son's f

Cr. 36 (JPO) (Estes/Graham/Bell) (USAO # 2017R00493): This matter relates to the conversion and use of confidential inspection information from the PCAOB by KPMG insiders to facilitate improved performance by KPMG in PCAOB inspections, the results of which are passed on to the SEC. We recently tried

ved in the grand jury presentation, reviewing the fruits of the Government's investigation, or developing prosecutorial strategy); United States v. Collins, 409 F. Supp. 3d 228, 241-43 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) (no joint investigation between U.S. Attorney's Office and SEC where the two entities conducted a smal

(no joint investigation between Government, Public Company Accounting Oversight Board ("PCAOB") and Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") where PCAOB was not involved in witness interviews or developing prosecutorial strategy, and SEC was not involved in the grand jury presentation, reviewing the

ved in the grand jury presentation, reviewing the fruits of the Government's investigation, or developing prosecutorial strategy); United States v. Collins, 409 F. Supp. 3d 228, 241-43 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) (no joint investigation between U.S. Attorney's Office and SEC where the two entities conducted a smal

(no joint investigation between Government, Public Company Accounting Oversight Board ("PCAOB") and Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") where PCAOB was not involved in witness interviews or developing prosecutorial strategy, and SEC was not involved in the grand jury presentation, reviewing the

ved in the grand jury presentation, reviewing the fruits of the Government's investigation, or developing prosecutorial strategy); United States v. Collins, 409 F. Supp. 3d 228, 241-43 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) (no joint investigation between U.S. Attorney's Office and SEC where the two entities conducted a smal

(no joint investigation between Government, Public Company Accounting Oversight Board ("PCAOB") and Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") where PCAOB was not involved in witness interviews or developing prosecutorial strategy, and SEC was not involved in the grand jury presentation, reviewing the