Epstein Secrets

sel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this day of April, 2009: Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. I 0 ./ Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #2 Jack Alan Goldberger Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein EFTA00722741 Case 9:08-cv-80119-

. As such, consolidation in the instant matter is not warranted in that not all common issues of fact are present and the parties are not identical. Kelly v. Kelly, 911 F.Supp. 66 (N.D. NY 1996Xconsolidation refused because it would only serve purpose of convenience of some witnesses, actions did not share all

nsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CWECF on this day of April, 2009: Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami, FL 33160 ounsel or Plamtill lane Doe Jack Alan Goldberger Atterb

. As such, consolidation in the instant matter is not warranted in that not all common issues of fact are present and the parties are not identical. Kelly v. Kelly, 911 F.Supp. 66 (N.D. NY 1996)(consolidation refused because it would only serve purpose of convenience of some witnesses, actions did not share al

nsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CWECF on this day of April, 2009: Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami, FL 33160 Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #2 Jack Alan Goldberger

. As such, consolidation in the instant matter is not warranted in that not all common issues of fact are present and the parties are not identical. Kelly v. Kelly, 911 F.Supp. 66 (N.D. NY 1996)(consolidation refused because it would only serve purpose of convenience of some witnesses, actions did not share al

nsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this Lay of April, 2009: Stuart S. Mermeistein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami. FL 33160 Fax: 305-931-0877 Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #2 Jac

. As such, consolidation in the instant matter is not warranted in that not all common issues of fact are present and the parties are not identical. Kelly v. Kelly, 911 F.Supp. 66 (N.D. NY 1996)(consolidation refused because it would only serve purpose of convenience of some witnesses, actions did not share al