Epstein Secrets

7, 2009 Respectfully submitted, By: s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) [email protected] Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) [email protected] MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiff 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, F

it would cause delay in one of the cases or if one of the cases is further into discovery than the other case”); see also Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Chiorazzo, 529 F.Supp. 2d 535, 542 (D.N.J. 2008) (denying consolidation of two actions because discovery was nearly complete in one while the other was in it

el of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this {!;iay of April, 2009: Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami, FL 33160 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877 [email protected]

were not identical); Borough of Olyphant v. PPL Corporation et al., 153 Fed.Appx. 80, 2005 WL 2673489 (C.A.3 (P.A.)); Ford Motor Credit Company v. Chiorazzo, 529 F.Supp.2d 535 (D. N.J. 2008). Under Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 42, the decision to consolidate cases for discovery is not mandatory but

sel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this day of April, 2009: Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. I 0 ./ Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #2 Jack Alan Goldberger Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein EFTA00722741 Case 9:08-cv-80119-

were not identical); $orouah of Olvoliant v. PPL Corporation et al. 153 Fed.Appx. 80, 2005 WL 2673489 (C.A.3 (P.A.)); Ford Motor Credit Cornrow v. Chiorazzo, 529 F.Supp.2d 535 (D. N.J. 2008). Under Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 42, the decision to consolidate cases for discovery is not mandatory but