Epstein Secrets

tiff; and (iii) such other and further relief this Court deems just and proper. Dated: April 27, 2009 Respectfully submitted, By: s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) [email protected] Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) [email protected] MERME

it would cause delay in one of the cases or if one of the cases is further into discovery than the other case”); see also Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Chiorazzo, 529 F.Supp. 2d 535, 542 (D.N.J. 2008) (denying consolidation of two actions because discovery was nearly complete in one while the other was in it

served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this {!;iay of April, 2009: Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami, FL 33160 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877

were not identical); Borough of Olyphant v. PPL Corporation et al., 153 Fed.Appx. 80, 2005 WL 2673489 (C.A.3 (P.A.)); Ford Motor Credit Company v. Chiorazzo, 529 F.Supp.2d 535 (D. N.J. 2008). Under Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 42, the decision to consolidate cases for discovery is not mandatory but

served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this day of April, 2009: Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. I 0 ./ Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #2 Jack Alan Goldberger Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein EFTA007227

were not identical); $orouah of Olvoliant v. PPL Corporation et al. 153 Fed.Appx. 80, 2005 WL 2673489 (C.A.3 (P.A.)); Ford Motor Credit Cornrow v. Chiorazzo, 529 F.Supp.2d 535 (D. N.J. 2008). Under Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 42, the decision to consolidate cases for discovery is not mandatory but