Epstein Secrets

Primary: Secondary: Secondary: Secondary: Secondary: Trial Counsel for Plaintiff1Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein SERVICE LIST Jack Scarola Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Br

PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 10 301.1 Deposition Testimony, Interrogatories, Stipulated Testimony, Stipulations, and Admissions Epstein hereby adopts and incorporates Edwards' Standard Jury Instruction 301.1. By agreeing to the instruction, Epstein does not waive the argumen

Primary: Secondary: Secondary: Secondary: Secondary: Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein SERVICE LIST Jack Scarola Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, M. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Co-Counsel Jro DeJendan&Counter-Plaintiff Bradl

ded]. Despite having asked this Court to enforce the discovery cutoff deadlines, on December I, 2017, Edwards moved for leave to serve Requests for Admissions. Edwards argues that Epstein's response to his Request for Judicial Notice of a New York sex offender registry triggered the need for the additiona

y: Secondary: Secondary: Secondary: Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein SERVICE LIST 5 EFTA00808730 Jack Scarola Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, •. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Brad

ded]. Despite having asked this Court to enforce the discovery cutoff deadlines, on December I, 2017, Edwards moved for leave to serve Requests for Admissions. Edwards argues that Epstein's response to his Request for Judicial Notice of a New York sex offender registry triggered the need for the additiona

ary: Primary: Primary: Second Second Second Second Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein SERVICE LIST Jack Scarola Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. yard Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rocke

mber 21, 2012 [D.E. 973] Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards' September 21, 2017, Motion to Compel Substantive Responses to Requests for Admissions Served February 26, 2013 [D.E. 974] Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards' September 21, 2017, Motion to Compel Substantive Responses to

y Committee held a hearing regarding child endangerment via the Internet. See H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 104-458, at 193 (1996), quoted in United States ' Searcy, 418 F.3d 1193, 1197 (11th Cir. 2005); see also K. Seto, "Note: How Should Legislation Deal with Children and the Victims and Perpetrators of Cyber

ted that it possessed information contradicting Reinhart's sworn affidavit. See DE 225.1 at 9-10, ¶¶ 43-45 ("in answering the victims' Requests for Admissions, the Government has admitted that it possess information that Reinhart leamed confidential non-public information about the Epstein case and he disc