Epstein Secrets

Fowler White Burnett 4, ATTORNEYS AT LAW March 15, 2011 VIA FACSIMILE SAND FIRST CLASS MAIL Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Re: Espstein v. Rothstein, et al Our File No.:

ubstantial and imminent threat to a fair trial in Epstein v. Edwards. In Florida, a court may take steps to protect against pretrial publicity. See Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 348 (1966); Sentinel Communications Co. v. Watson 615 So. 2d 768, 769 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). The limitations imposed by the

.S. Mail this y ay of April, 2011 to: Marc S. Nurik, Esq., One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301; Jack Scarola, Esquire, Searcy, Denney & Scarola, P.A., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, P.O. Drawer 3626, West Palm Beach, FL 33409, Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire, Atterbury Goldb

Miami Herald Publishing Co, v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976). Cowls in Florida may take steps to protect against pretrial publicity. See Sheppard v - 2 - EFTA00599555 CASE NO. 50 2009 CA 040800 X:OO:MB AQ Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 348, 86 S. Ct. 1507, 161. Ed. 2d 600 (1966); Sentinel Communic

Fowler White Burnett )p, ATTORNEYS AT LAW -'"" March 17, 2011 VIA FACSIMILE (561) 686-6300 AND FIRST CLASS MAIL Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Re: Espstein v. Rothstein, et al Our File No.:

ubstantial and imminent threat to a fair trial in Epstein v. Edwards. In Florida, a court may take steps to protect against pretrial publicity. See Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 348 (1966); Sentinel Communications Co. v. Watson, 615 So. 2d 768, 769 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). The limitations imposed by the