Epstein Secrets

-80736-KAM Document 127 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2011 Page 8 of 25 best promoted when the existence of a federal right is directly reached . ." Morrison v. Amway Corp., 323 F.3d 920, 925 (I Cir. 2003) (emphasis added) (internal citation omitted). In this case, it is quite clear that the Government'

equitable remedy."). And the CVRA is obviously "remedial legislation" that should be broadly construed to achieve its remedial purposes. Edwards v. Kia Motors of America, Inc., 554 F.3d 943, 948 (11th Cir 2008). A good illustration of the broad power of district courts to remedy CVRA violations comes from the Fifth Circu

-80736-KAM Document 127 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2011 Page 8 of 25 best promoted when the existence of a federal right is directly reached . ." Morrison. Amway Corp., 323 F.3d 920, 925 (I Cir. 2003) (emphasis added) (internal citation omitted). In this case, it is quite clear that the Government's

te equitable remedy."). And the CVRA is obviously "remedial legislation" that should be broadly construed to achieve its remedial purposes. Edwards. Kia Motors of America, Inc., 554 F.3d 943, 948 (11th Cir 2008). A good illustration of the broad power of district courts to remedy CVRA violations comes from the Fifth Circu

mplicate Constitutional concerns. Of course, the Constitution only constrains governmental actors — not private parties. See, e.g., United States v. Morrison, 529 U.S. 598, 2 Because of this inconsistency between what government lawyers have already disclosed and what the Government is now arguing that t

the more expansive interpretation. Not only is the CVRA "remedial legislation" that should be broadly construed to achieve its purposes, Edwards v. Kia Motors of America, Inc., 554 F.3d 943, 948 (11th Cir 2008), but the sponsors of the CVRA stated that the right to confer was "intended to be expansive. For Interestingly,