5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
Fla. L.R. 5.4(A). It is well settled that the media and the public in general possess a common-law right to inspect and copy judicial records. See Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978). "The right to inspect and copy records is not absolute, however. As with other forms of a
ument 27 Entered on FLSD Docket 07:1672008 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA NO. 08-80380-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 4, Plaintiff, 1. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SEAL THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Moti
Fla. L.R. 5.4(A). It is well settled that the media and the public in general possess a common-law right to inspect and copy judicial records. See Nixon I Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978). "The right to inspect and copy records is not absolute, however. As with other forms of ac
lerk of the Court for the purpose of Initiating the civil docket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON THE REVERSE OF THE FORM.) 1(a) PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS JANE DOE NO. 2, JEFFREY EPSTEIN (b) COUNTY OF RESIDENCE OF FIRST LISTED PLAINTIFF OUT OF STATE (EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES) COUNTY OF RESIDENCE OF FIRST
ound if 7 you could then, Mr. Rodriguez. 8 A. I work in Long Island, Montauk Lake Club 9 and Marina, a very exclusive country club where 10 Mr. Nixon used to spend his summers, Richard 11 Nixon. I worked for Leona Helmsley in New York. 12 Very demanding lady. And then Mr. Torres in Texas 13 in h
ge 270 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 2 3 JANE DOE NO. 2, 4 Plaintiff, 5 Vs. 6 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 7 Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, Plaintiff, 9 8 10 CASE NO: 08-CV-80119 CONDENSED CASE NO: 08-CV-80232 Vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. 13 ,14 JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO
und if 7 you could then, Mr. Rodriguez. 8 A. I work in Long Island, Montauk Lake Club 9 and Marina, a very exclusive country club where 10 Mr. Nixon used to spend his summers, Richard 11 Nixon. I worked for Leona Helmsley in New York. 12 Very demanding lady. And then Mr. Torres in Texas 13 in h
EPSTEIN, 7 Defendant. 8 9 10 Vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. 13 JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO: 08-CV-80232 Plaintiff, 11 12 CONDENSED ,14 JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO: 08-CV-80380 15 Plaintiff, 16 Vs. 17 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 18 Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO: 08-CV-80381 Plaintiff, 19 20 2
Fla. L.R. 5.4(A). It is well settled that the media and the public in general possess a common-law right to inspect and copy judicial records. See Nixon ! Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978). "The right to inspect and copy records is not absolute, however. As with other forms of ac
use of the Clerk of the Court for the purpose of Initiating the dull docket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON THE REVERSE OF THE FORM.) 1(a) PLAINTIFFS JANE DOE NO. 2, (b) COUNTY OF RESIDENCE OF FIRST LISTED PLAINTIFF OUT OF STATE (EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES) DEFENDANTS JEFFREY EPSTEIN COUNTY OF RESIDEN
Entities connected to both Cynthia Nixon and JANE DOE NO.

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON
United States
LOCATIONJane Doe
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSON
Bill Clinton
PERSON
Richard Nixon
PERSON
Donald Trump
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON
Julie K. Brown
PERSON
Prince Andrew
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
Marc Rich
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSONLeon Black
PERSON
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON
Joe Biden
PERSONJack Goldberger
PERSON