Epstein Secrets

R,FRANKLYN P LAVERTY,ANNE M GRIFFIS,NIXON MARCUS,JEFFREY A SUMMERS,RUTH A

ALLEN,JOSEPH FISHER,MARJORIE S SCHELLER,DR ZBIGNIEW PAGLIARI,RICHARD A KIER

F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006) passim Mitchell v. Fishbein, 227 F.R.D. 239 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) 15 Nebraska Press Ass'n v. Stuart, 427 U.S. 539 (1976) 10 Nixon v. Warner Corn:wins, Inc., 435 U.S. 589 (1978) 10 Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court, 464 U.S. 501 (1984) 10 Savitt v. Vacco, No. 95-CV-1

ess-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court, 464 U.S. 501 (1984) 10 Savitt v. Vacco, No. 95-CV-1842(RSP/DRH), 1996 WL 663888 (N.D.N.Y. Nov. 8, 1996) 7 Schiller v. City of New York, No. 04 CIV. 792I(ICMK), 2006 WL 2788256 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 27, 2006) 7, 12 Sec. and Exch. Conun'n v. TheStreet.Com, 273 F.3d 22

Nersesian, 824 F.2d 1294 (2d Cir. 1987) 233 EFTA00099959 United States v. Nitcche, 843 F. Supp. 2d 4 (D.D.C. 2011) 201, 202 United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974) 282 United States v. Noble, No. 07 Cr. 284 (RJS), 2008 WL 140966 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 11, 2008) 164 United States v. Okwumabua,

r 18, 2018. Shortly thereafter, in or about December or January 2018, the Government indicated to at I that it intended to make document requests. Schiller generally advised the Government that a protective order would govern some of the materials. (Id. at 3). In or about February 2019, approximately t

150 United States v. Nemesian, 824 F.2d 1294 (2d Cir. 1987) 154 United States v. Nitsche, 843 F. Supp. 2d 4 (D.D.C. 2011) 136 United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974) 190 United States v. Noble, No. 07 Cr. 284 (RJS), 2008 WL 140966 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 11, 2008) 112 United States v. Okwumabua,

bpoenas and Ex Pane Applications for Materials SOW- after opening t mment identified possible victims and their counsel trroiigh ich ina Boies Schiller. (Def. Mem. 3, Ex. E at 2-3). SDNY first cont oies Schiller about its investigation on or about December 18, 2018. Shortly thereafter, in oar Dec

ated that in deciding whether to unseal materials it was important to give weight to the impact on a criminal defendant's right to a fair trial. In Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589 (1978), a number of media moved the district court to release audio tapes admitted into evidence in the

fight with Epstein's alleged victims long before her recent arrest. "(Maxwell] has been using this Court as a sword and a shield for many years." Schiller wrote in a filing earlier this year, "and she, Jeffrey Epstein, and their other co-conspirators have attempted to thwart their victims from obtaini

organ, Michael (CC Pr Moyer, Michelle (CC B) Nerona, Jocelyn (Volunt) Neto, Elizabeth (Felony) Nebo, Uriel (Exec) Newman, Arlene (INVEST) Nixon, Melissa (CC B) Nolan, Terry (DOVE Felony)Nolan, Tony (Belle Glade) Ojeda, Ada (CC P) Orozco, Eyder Ortiz, Carlos Parker, Angela Parker, Eli

yl (Eco Crime) Santamaria, Michelle (HOM) Satcher, Linda (Appeals) Satcher, Lisa (Fel U) Sauvola, Nicole (Belie Glade) Scharaga, Joan (CAC) Schiller, Gregory (Juv Intake) Seder, Sandra Mall Rm) Selvig, Kenneth (INTAKE) Shepherd, Caroline (CC) Shepherd, Robed Juv Intake) Shepherd, Tonya (I