Epstein Secrets

has observed that the executive branch "has exclusive authority and absolute discretion to decide whether to prosecute a case," United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683, 693, 94 S.Ct. 3090, 41 L.Ed2d 1039 (1974), and the Gov- ernment therefore argues that courts lack jurisdiction to enjoin a criminal

3, 925 (N.D. 111.1964) (motion to quash grand jury subpoe. nas). EFTA00191855 808 770 FEDERAL REPORTER, 2d SERIES "reasonable basis" standard. Pollard, 283 FSupp. at 258; Reporters Committee, 693 F2d at 1064. See also Bran:burg v. Hayes; 408 U.S. 665, 699-01, 707-08, 92 S.Ct. 2646, 2665-66, 2669

ur legal team not been successful in stopping the Nixon Admuinistration’s efforts to deport Lennon on tru

unsolicited advice, such as when I repeatedly urged him to commute the life sentence of Jonathan Pollard to time served. I pestered him so much about Pollard that he finally told me he didn’t want to hear anything more about it. I replied, “You can choose not to listen, but I’m not going to stay quiet.” In

disclosure, the work product doctrine should not be "expansively construed" because it is in "derogation of the search for truth." United States I, Nixon, 418 U.S. EFTA00177850 683, 710 (1974). Law Offices is not the only case to cast doubt on Sporck. See generally P. Grady, Discovery of Computer

result in more limited waiver, as to the materials actually produced. This concept was clari- fied further y the Court in Martin Mari- etta Corp. . Pollard, 856 F.2d 619, 626 i (4th Cir.19 ), where it stated: irst and most generally, opinion work product is to be accorded great protection by the cou