Epstein Secrets

of $506,847.78 for 5 years of sexual harassment and sexual touching was reasonable). Unfortunately, the parties were unable to reach a agreement. Myers clearly demonstrates that Epstein's offer to agree to a net worth in excess of $50,000,00 is reasonable in light of the allegations made by Jane Doe

offer to agree to a net worth in excess of $50,000,00 is reasonable in light of the allegations made by Jane Doe as compared to the allegations in Myers. Moreover, allowing such discovery at this juncture goes against the grain and the law in that Plaintiff has not made a reasonable showing establish

safe harbor of the 5'" Amendment2 ate Ohio v. Reiner, 532 U.S. 17 (1991). 2 See PeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4d. DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan. 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964Xthe Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fou

ures. Such a stipulation more than satisfies any necessity for the disclosure of the tax returns or any additional net worth information. See e.g., Myers v. Central Florida Investments, Inc., 592 F.3d 1201 (I Ith Cir. 2010)(reasoning that a compensatory award of $103,622.09 and a punitive damage award

of $506,847.78 for 5 years of sexual harassment and sexual touching was reasonable). Unfortunately, the parties were unable to reach a agreement. Myers clearly demonstrates that Epstein's offer to agree to a net worth in excess of $50,000,00 is reasonable in light of the allegations made by Jane Doe

e safe harbor of the 5 Amendment.2 See Ohio v. Reiner, 532 U.S. 17(1991). 2 See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company. 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fo

Bottoms, B. L., Shaver, P. R., & Goodman, G. S. (1996). Religion and child abuse. American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children Advisor. Myers, J. E. B., Saywitz, K. J., & Goodman, G. S. (1996). Psychological research on children as witnesses: Practical implications for children's interview

pecial memory mechanisms. In R. Uttl, Ohta, N., & A. Sigenthaler (Eds), Emotion and memory (pp. 233-257). London: Blackwell Press. Goodman, G. S., Myers, J. E. B., Qin, J., Quas, J. A., Castelli, P., Redlich, A., & Rogers, L (2006). Hearsay versus children's testimony: Effects of truthful and decepti

595-613. Goodman, G. S. (2006). Children's eyewitness memory: A modern history and contemporary commentary. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 811-832. Malloy, L., Mitchell, E., Block, S., Quas, J., & Goodman, G. S. (2006). Children's eyewitness memory: Balancing children's needs and defendants' rights whe

ttachment and cognitive inhibition in children's memory for a stressful event. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 83, 262-290. Redlich, A., Myers, J., Goodman, G. S., & Qin, J. (2002). A comparison of two forms of hearsay in child sexual abuse cases. Child Maltreatment, 7,312-28. Alexander, K

595-613. Goodman, G. S. (2006). Children's eyewitness memory: A modem history and contemporary commentary. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 811-832. Malloy, L., Mitchell, E., Block, S., Quas, J., Sr Goodman, G. S. (2006). Children's eyewitness memory: Balancing children's needs and defendants' rights wh