Epstein Secrets

anks, From: Jeff Pagliuc. Sent: Monday, July 15, 2019 16:15 To: Cc: Nicole Subject: Re: Maxwell < Sorry I missed your call. I had to travel to North Carolina over the weekend to assist with some family issues. I am on my way back to Denver now. I have a court appearance in Aspen, Colorado tomorrow and sho

From: To: Jeff Pagliuc Cc: Nicole Simmons Subject: RE: Maxwell Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 20:18:39 +0000 Importance: Normal Jeff, We haven't spoken to Mark and hadn't heard f

Please let us know if it would be useful to chat in the interim—we're happy to, if so—and we look forward to being in touch soon. thank you, From: Jeff Pagliuca Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2019 18:56 To: Cc: Nicole Simmons Subject: RE: Maxwell EFTA00083886 Hello, I expect you all have been busy in the las

o discuss a potential proffer metting during our next call which I think is scheduled for 7-11 at 4pm my time. Best Regards, Jeff <image001.jpg> Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. ISO East 10th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 Main 303.831.7364 FX 303.832.2628 www. m aw.com CONFIDENTIALITY NO

d to being in touch soon. thank you, From: Jeff Pagliuca Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2019 18:56 To: Cc: Nic

ns v. Delo, 124 F.3d 944 (8th Cir. 1997) 25 Jones v. Jago, 575 F.2d 1164 (6th Cir. 1978) 25 Ex Parte Lange, 85 U.S. (18 Wall.) 163 (1873) 18 North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711 (1969) 18 United States v. Annabi, 771 F.2d 670 (2d Cir. 1985) United States v. Bortnovsky, passim 820 F.2d 572 (2d C

RETRIAL MOTIONS RELATING TO THE S2 SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP 800 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 Phone: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 Phone: Bobbi C. Stemheim Law Offices of Bobbi C.

rd Avenue New York, NY 10022 Phone: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C

4412 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) Cases Ex parte Lange, 85 U.S. (18 Wall.) 163 (1873) 11 Morris v. Reynolds, 264 F.3d 38 (2d Cir. 2001) 12 North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711 (1969) II, 12, 13 United States v. Annabi, 771 F.2d 670 (2d Cir. 1985) passim United States v. Cambindo Valencia, 609

MENTAL PRETRIAL MOTIONS RELATING TO THE S2 SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP 800 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 Bobbi C. Stemheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim

800 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C

esident and Chief McGraw-Hill Companies USA Executive Officer Raymond McGuire Head, Global Banking Citi USA Patrick McHenry Congressman from North Carolina (Republican). 10th District, USA Lee A. McIntire Chairman and Chief Executive Officer CH2M HILL Companies Ltd USA Michael McKelvy President, G

University of Reading United Kingdom Stephen G. Pagliuca Managing Director Bain Capital USA Scott Paint

Applicable Law The Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution "protects against multiple punishments for the same offense." North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 717 (1969). Accordingly, a defendant cannot be sentenced for multiplicitous charges covering the same crime. "An indictmen

o use them for purposes of sexual massages? MR. PAGLIUCA: Objection to the form and foundation. A. Can yo

Applicable Law The Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution "protects against multiple punishments for the same offense." North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 717 (1969). Accordingly, a defendant cannot be sentenced for multiplicitous charges covering the same crime. "An indictmen

o use them for purposes of sexual massages? MR. PAGLIUCA: Objection to the form and foundation. A. Can yo

Applicable Law The Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution "protects against multiple punishments for the same offense." North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 717 (1969). Accordingly, a defendant cannot be sentenced for multiplicitous charges covering the same crime. "An indictmen

o use them for purposes of sexual massages? MR. PAGLIUCA: Objection to the form and foundation. A. Can yo

Applicable Law The Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution "protects against multiple punishments for the same offense." North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 717 (1969). Accordingly, a defendant cannot be sentenced for multiplicitous charges covering the same crime. "An indictmen

o use them for purposes of sexual massages? MR. PAGLIUCA: Objection to the form and foundation. 123 EFTA

Applicable Law The Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution "protects against multiple punishments for the same offense." North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 717 (1969). Accordingly, a defendant cannot be sentenced for multiplicitous charges covering the same crime. "An indictmen

o use them for purposes of sexual massages? MR. PAGLIUCA: Objection to the form and foundation. A. Can yo