Epstein Secrets

Epstein. This Court has already ruled that everything post Link & Rockenbach is not a violation of the November 2010 Agreed Order but, rather, is a State Court issue, and will not be considered at the Show Cause hearing. Therefore, there is no further live testimony that can be elicited from Epstein that wo

r LLC °tense or anner a e, ersstng, cards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the Utah University of Doe Peter E. Shapiro Shapiro Law uite 3000 ounse or ., . . an ane Doe Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Niall T. McLachlan Carlton Fields Jorden Burt P.A. 200 °ri

Epstein. This Court has already ruled that everything post Link & Rockenbach is not a violation of the November 2010 Agreed Order but, rather, is a State Court issue. Therefore, there is no further live testimony that can be elicited from Epstein that would benefit the Court in deciding if Epstein violated

eissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of h Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe Peter E. Shapiro Sha.iro Law Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe Niall T. McLachlan Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A. Isaac M. Marcushamer Berger Singerman LLP

ese show cause proceedings were instituted shortly thereafter. A privilege determination has never been made and that issue is currently before the State Court. The only issue for this Court to decide on October 26, 2018, is if Fowler White and/or Epstein violated the November 2010 Agreed Order. 2Jeffrey E

sing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe Peter E. Shapiro Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe Niall T. McLachlan Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A. Isaac M. Marcushamer Counsel for Fowler White Burnett, P