Epstein Secrets

Epstein. This Court has already ruled that everything post Link & Rockenbach is not a violation of the November 2010 Agreed Order but, rather, is a State Court issue, and will not be considered at the Show Cause hearing. Therefore, there is no further live testimony that can be elicited from Epstein that wo

received select documents from the disc in February 2018. The select documents were provided to Epstein after Link & Rockenbach located the disc in Fowler White's boxes in February 2018. Because there are no material facts in dispute, live testimony will have no impact on this Court's determination of whether

ecum of J. Epstein and Motion for Protective Order 06/20/18 RJG Review Notice of Taking Video Deposition Duces 0.90 355.50 Tecum of J. Epstein (State Court) and hearing transcript on B. Edwards' Motion to Permit Limited Deposition of J. Epstein in preparation for drafting Objections to Notice 06/20/1

ein and D. Indyke re same; work on objection to duces tecum; work on Response to S. Rothstein's Motion to Dismiss; communications with J. lanno re Fowler White's insurance information 06/19/18 RJG Review Notice and Re-Notice of taking Video 1.90 750.50 Deposition Duces Tecum of J. Epstein, Bankruptcy Cou

Epstein. This Court has already ruled that everything post Link & Rockenbach is not a violation of the November 2010 Agreed Order but, rather, is a State Court issue. Therefore, there is no further live testimony that can be elicited from Epstein that would benefit the Court in deciding if Epstein violated

received select documents from the disc in February 2018. The select documents were provided to Epstein after Link & Rockenbach located the disc in Fowler White's boxes in February 2018. Because there are no material facts in dispute, live testimony will have no impact on this Court's determination of whether

ese show cause proceedings were instituted shortly thereafter. A privilege determination has never been made and that issue is currently before the State Court. The only issue for this Court to decide on October 26, 2018, is if Fowler White and/or Epstein violated the November 2010 Agreed Order. 2Jeffrey E

hat request. (D.E. 6325; D.E. 6345.) Movants allege that Fowler White EFTA00794256 and Epstein violated this Court's November 2010 Agreed Order by Fowler White's alleged retention of a copy of a disc that was provided to Epstein and his current counsel (Link & Rockenbach) in 2018. (D.E. 6326 at 6-11.) The No

Epstein. This Court has already ruled that everything post Link & Rockenbach is not a violation of the November 2010 Agreed Order but, rather, is a State Court issue, and will not be considered at the Show Cause hearing. Therefore, there is no further live testimony that can be elicited from Epstein that wo

received select documents from the disc in February 2018. The select documents were provided to Epstein after Link & Rockenbach located the disc in Fowler White's boxes in February 2018. Because there are no material facts in dispute, live testimony will have no impact on this Court's determination of whether

osenfeld! Adler, P.A., in which the following were statements made by William Scherer, Razorback's counsel: • "[I]n November we filed a lawsuit in State Court and we alleged that as part of Mr. Rothstein and the firm, and the firm's employees, and maybe some of the firm's attorneys, conspired to use the E

bate stamped pages of documents. Rather, Special Master Carney wanted a searchable disc. It is still a mystery how and when the disc came back into Fowler White's possession after it was sent to Special Master Carney and no evidence has been presented to resolve that question definitively. 5Excerpts of the Ma

ecum of J. Epstein and Motion for Protective Order 06/20/18 RJG Review Notice of Taking Video Deposition Duces 0.90 355.50 Tecum of J. Epstein (State Court) and hearing transcript on B. Edwards' Motion to Permit Limited Deposition of J. Epstein in preparation for drafting Objections to Notice 06/20/1

ein and D. Indyke re same; work on objection to duces tecum; work on Response to S. Rothstein's Motion to Dismiss; communications with J. lanno re Fowler White's insurance information 06/19/18 RJG Review Notice and Re-Notice of taking Video 1.90 750.50 Deposition Duces Tecum of J. Epstein, Bankruptcy Cou