Epstein Secrets

, 2005, Defendants EPSTEIN and traveled from Teterboro, New Jersey to Palm Beach County, Florida, aboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Defendant HYPERION AIR, INC. #. On or about May 6, 2005, Defendants EPSTEIN, and traveled from Teterboro, New Jersey to Palm Beach County, Florida, aboard the Gulfs

[Mann] Act that the sole and single purpose of the transportation of a female in interstate commerce was such immoral practices."); United States v. Ellis , 935 F.2d 385, 389-90 (1st Cir.1991) (jury could consider that defendant's personal motive for bringing minor on interstate family vacations and b

ned via grand jury subpoenas. CONCLUSION Based on tiling recommend that the Office approve the attached indictment charging Epstein, , JEGE, and Hyperion. I also recommend that the Office refuse a pre-indictment interview to Epstein or his counsel and that no information about the status of the case

e [Mann] Act that the sole and single purpose of the trans rtation of a female in interstate commerce was such immoral practices."); United States Ellis, 935 F.2d 385, 389-90 (1st Cir.1991) (jury could consider that defendant's personal motive for bringing minor on interstate family vacations and bu

rtant Information Total Labor. Total Pane: Total Shipping: Total Outside Repair: Additional Charges: Tax: Amount Duo: Deposit: Balance Due: Hyperion AILLLC or Authorized Representative 30 of 30 Printed by EBG 3 (www.dalcomedia.com) Date CONFIDENTIAL Subject to Protective Order IATS - 000534

tion: RUSSELL LANDON SCOTT on 06/08/19 Hours Subtotal Labor Parts: Shipping: Outside Repair: Item Subtotal: CONFIDENTIAL 9 of 30 Printed by Ellis 3 (www.datcomedia.com) Subject to Protective Order IATS - 000513 SONY GM_0277461S SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17

[Mann] Act that the sole and single purpose of the transportation of a female in interstate commerce was such immoral practices."); United States v. Ellis , 935 F.2d 385, 389-90 (1st Cir.1991) (jury could consider that defendant's personal motive for bringing minor on interstate family vacations and b

rand jury subpoenas. CONCLUSION Based on the fore oin , I recommend that the Office approve the attached indictment charging Epstein, , JEGE, and Hyperion. I also recommend that the Office refuse a pre-indictment interview to Epstein or his counsel and that no information about the status of the case b