Epstein Secrets

re. When asked, the closest case suggested by the prosecutors was United States I Boehm—and it hardly could differ more from Mr. Epstein's case. In Boehm, the defendant was charged with conspiracy to distribute cocaine and cocaine base to minors, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), and 859(a)

ral prosecutors have pursued under the federal sta tes at issue here. When asked, the closest case suggested by the prosecutors was United States I Boehm—and it hardly could differ more from Mr. Epstein's case. In Boehm, the defendant was charged with conspiracy to distribute cocaine and cocaine base

Bo,nl Cortinird ComioOlnal Attormq Hooter or New Ito zoo tf, Florida Rol s May 17, 2007 A. Marie Vil

e are several emails between myself and Jay Lefkowitz about the appointment of I GAL and the possibility of I restitution trust fund similar to the Boehm case out of Alaska. I obtained the trust fund agreement and spoke with the in Alaska. The trust fund a reement was very complex and required I bank

tation cases was I hot-button issue at the time. The District of Alaska USAO had multi-victim child exploitation case with I wealthy % defendant (Boehm) where they had set u trust fund with I bank and I trustee. With Drew help, I ex lored setting up I similar situation in the Epstein case (Exhibit

then later offering Epstein the option of not having to provide the attorney-representative for the victims; (15) refusing to allow the agents and Ito notify the victims about the terms of the NPA and about the change of plea; (16) allowing Epstein to continue to enjoy the benefits of the NPA even

Kara. CrSICALJEFfiltv t Ron: a a., i wall° 7 - t. VW Ca 01 m.o.& 57 PM:MBEAM tt 33403 Ilostbno Muffle: 40t03/114 OBTS Mats: 500320210 Boehm° oar 04/30003 That 1019 aaaanna Afoot, 01 PI MM *now; OS OLI.P‘Al0 Rolm* Out Pa'A HOW* FarOve Arnow:No Wynn, Noreen 747071.4 JACIttl Nate: O.40

p PHONE NUMBER OWNER'S NAME i 0.0.0 ADDRESS &Ito& Cry 10 PHONE NUMBER SUSPECTS MUM i MOIL I.2