Epstein Secrets

another state. The travel must be for the purpose of engaging in the unlawful sexual act. See also Hansen v. Huff, 291 U.S. 559, 562-63 (1934) and Mortensen v. Unikd Stales, 322 U.S. 369, 374 (1944) ("An intention that the women or girls shall engage in the conduct outlawed by Section 2 must be found to

s alleged to have had improper sexual contact, solely in Florida, with women who were under the age of 18. Mr. Epstein maintained residences both in New York and Florida and would repeatedly fly from New York to Florida where his primary residence was located. It is alleged that before he would travel to

n another state. The travel must be for the purpose of engaging in the unlawful sexual act. See so Hansen v. Huff, 291 U.S. 559, 562-63 (1934) and Mortensen v. UnitekStates, 322 U.S. 369, 374 (1944) ("An intention that the women or girls shall engage in the conduct outlawed by Section 2 must be found to

s alleged to have had improper sexual contact, solely in Florida, with womcn who were under the age of 18. Mr. Epstein maintained residences both in New York and Florida and would repeatedly fly from New York to Florida where his primary residence was located He would travel to Florida for purposes of re

in another state. The travel must be for the purpose of engaging in the unlawful sexual act. See s2 liftmen HufT, 291 U.S. 559, 562-63 (1934) and Mortensen'. United Stales. 322 U.S. 369, 374 (1944) ("An intention that the women or girls shall engage in the conduct outlawed by Section 2 must be found to

s alleged to have had improper sexual contact, solely in Florida, with womcn who were under the age of 18. Mr. Epstein maintained residences both in New York and Florida and would repeatedly fly from New York to Florida where his primary residence was located He would travel to Florida for purposes of re

prove that the defendant's sole purpose for traveling and transporting the individual was to have the individual engage in illegal sexual activity. Mortensen v. United States , 322 U.S. 369, 374 (1944); Crespo v. United States , 151 F.2d 44, 46 (1st Cir. 1945). This offense carries a statutory maximum of

ndant caused one or more telephone calls to be made to a telephone used by Jane Doe #4. 5. On May 1, 2004, Defendants EPSTEIN, and traveled from New York, New York to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned by Defendant JEGE, INC. 6. On May 3, 2004, Defendant caused one or mo

.7 The Supreme Court has repeatedly interpreted this language to require that the illegal activity be the dominant motive for the travel. See, e.g., Mortensen 'United States, 322 U.S. 369, 373 (1944) (". . .an intention that the women or girls shall engage in the conduct outlawed by Section 2 must be foun

ate with the young prostitute, even if the date never happened. And that would be so even if the prostitute were 17'/2 (and despite the fact that in New York the age of consent is 17, since prostitution is a "sexual offense" in New York). Clearly, these are applications and outcomes Congress did not conte

going determination, it is not necessary to examine the further contention of appellant that the judgment should be versed under authority of of Mortensen United States, 322 U.S. 369, 64 S.Ct. 1 . The judgment is reversed and the caw remanded with directions to enter judg- ment of acquittal. SANBOR

his room at a hotel in New York, New York; e. On or about January 15, 2008, a prostitute working with the Emperors Club went to a client's hotel in New York, New York; f. On or about January 18, 2008, TEMEKA RACHELLE LEWIS, a/k/a "Rachelle," the d endant, spoke over the telephone If with a new prostit

entry [into the United States] cannot be said to be with the purpose `only that she might live in a state of concubinage."' 291 U.S. at 562. And in Mortensen, the Court likewise held that two women who took a trip from their home, returned home, and then resumed their illegal prostitution business did not

g the period of her involvement with the Defendants, Jane Doe #11 attended the Professional Performing Arts School, a public high school, located in New York, New York. 25. During the period of her involvernent with the Defendants, Jane Doe #13 attended John I. Leonard High School in Palm Beach County.

prove that the defendant's sole purpose for traveling and transporting the individual was to have the individual engage in illegal sexual activity. Mortensen v. United States, 322 U.S. 369, 374 (1944); Crespo v. United States, 151 F.2d 44, 46 (1st Cir. 1945). This offense carries a statutory maximum of t

School in Palm Beach County. 24. During the period of her involvement with the Defendants, Jane Doe #11 attended a public high school, located in New York, New York. 25. During the period of her involvement with the Defendants, Jane Doe #13 attended High School in Palm Beach County. 5 EFTA02857679

prove that the defendant's sole purpose for traveling and transporting the individual was to have the individual engage in illegal sexual activity. Mortensen v. United States , 322 U.S. 369, 374 (1944); Crespo v. United States , 151 F.2d 44, 46 (1st Cir. 1945). This offense carries a statutory maximum of

ndant caused one or more telephone calls to be made to a telephone used by Jane Doe #6. 5. On May 1, 2004, Defendants EPSTEIN, and traveled from New York, New York to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned by Defendant JEGE, INC. EFTA02857788 6. On May 3, 2004, Defendant c