Back to Network
6
Shared Docs
6
Same-Page
6 / 9
Mentions
Document Mentions (6 shared documents)
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
anon of statutory construction that "discourages courts from adopting a reading of a statute that renders any part of the statute mere surplusage." Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S. 137, 146 (1995)(noting that each word in a statute is intended to have "particular, nonsuperfluous meaning"). Congress i
s Act case, in which it admitted that a physician, Dr. Jackson, was an employee of the Veterans Administration at the time he treated the plaintiff Sulkoff. Subsequently, the United States Attorney's Office became aware that Dr. Jackson was not an employee of the United States. When the United States so
ly if it pertains to a fact, not a legal conclusion. McCaskill v. SCI Mgmt. Corp., 298 F.3d 677, 681-82 (7th Cir. 2002)(Rovner, J., concurring). In Sulkoff v. United States, 2003 WL 1903349 (S.D. Ind. 2003), the United States filed its answer in a Federal Tort Claims Act case, in which it admitted that
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
anon of statutory construction that "discourages courts from adopting a reading of a statute that renders any part of the statute mere surplusage." Bailey v. United States , 516 U.S. 137, 146 (1995)(noting that each word in a statute is intended to have "particular, nonsuperfluous meaning"). EFTA00208
ms Act case, in which it admitted that a physician, Dr. Jackson, was an employee of the Veterans Administration at the time he treated the plaintiff Sulkoff. Subsequently, the United States Attorney's Office became aware that Dr. Jackson was not an employee of the United States. When the United States so
if it pertains to a fact, not a legal conclusion. McCaskill v. SCI Mgmt. Corp. , 298 F.3d 677, 681-82 (7 III Cir. 2002)(Rovner, J., concurring). In Sulkoff v. United States , 2003 WL 1903349 (S.D. Ind. 2003), the United States filed its answer in a Federal Tort Claims Act case, in which it admitted that
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
anon of statutory construction that "discourages courts from adopting a reading of a statute that renders any part of the statute mere surplusage." Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S. 137, 146 (1995)(noting that each word in a statute is intended to have "particular, nonsuperfluous meaning"). Congress i
s Act case, in which it admitted that a physician, Dr. Jackson, was an employee of the Veterans Administration at the time he treated the plaintiff Sulkoff. Subsequently, the United States Attorney's Office became aware that Dr. Jackson was not an employee of the United States. When the United States so
ly if it pertains to a fact, not a legal conclusion. McCaskill v. SCI Mgmt. Corp., 298 F.3d 677, 681-82 (7th Cir. 2002)(Rovner, J., concurring). In Sulkoff v. United States, 2003 WL 1903349 (S.D. Ind. 2003), the United States filed its answer in a Federal Tort Claims Act case, in which it admitted that
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
anon of statutory construction that "discourages courts from adopting a reading of a statute that renders any part of the statute mere surplusage." Bailey' United States, 516 U.S. 137, 146 (1995)(noting that each word in a statute is intended to have "particular, nonsuperfluous meaning"). Congress int
s Act case, in which it admitted that a physician, Dr. Jackson, was an employee of the Veterans Administration at the time he treated the plaintiff Sulkoff. Subsequently, the United States Attorney's Office became aware that Dr. Jackson was not an employee of the United States. When the United States s
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
anon of statutory construction that "discourages courts from adopting a reading of a statute that renders any part of the statute mere surplusage." Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S. 137, 146 (1995)(noting that each word in a statute is intended to have "particular, nonsuperfluous meaning"). Congress i
s Act case, in which it admitted that a physician, Dr. Jackson, was an employee of the Veterans Administration at the time he treated the plaintiff Sulkoff. Subsequently, the United States Attorney's Office became aware that Dr. Jackson was not an employee of the United States. When the United States so
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
anon of statutory construction that "discourages courts from adopting a reading of a statute that renders any part of the statute mere surplusage." Bailey'. United States, 516 U.S. 137, 146 (1995)(noting that each word in a statute is intended to have "particular, nonsuperfluous meaning"). Congress in
s Act case, in which it admitted that a physician, Dr. Jackson, was an employee of the Veterans Administration at the time he treated the plaintiff Sulkoff. Subsequently, the United States Attorney's Office became aware that Dr. Jackson was not an employee of the United States. When the United States so
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (228)
Entities connected to both Bailey and Sulkoff
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON150 w/ Bailey·6 w/ Sulkoff
United States
LOCATION83 w/ Bailey·6 w/ Sulkoff
LB
Leon Black
PERSON79 w/ Bailey·6 w/ Sulkoff
Prince Andrew
PERSON79 w/ Bailey·6 w/ Sulkoff
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION73 w/ Bailey·6 w/ Sulkoff
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON66 w/ Bailey·5 w/ Sulkoff
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON68 w/ Bailey·2 w/ Sulkoff
Michael Jackson
PERSON55 w/ Bailey·6 w/ Sulkoff
Michigan
LOCATION53 w/ Bailey·6 w/ Sulkoff
FBI
ORGANIZATION47 w/ Bailey·6 w/ Sulkoff
Eric Trump
PERSON47 w/ Bailey·6 w/ Sulkoff
the Southern District
LOCATION46 w/ Bailey·6 w/ Sulkoff
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION45 w/ Bailey·6 w/ Sulkoff
India
LOCATION42 w/ Bailey·5 w/ Sulkoff
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON43 w/ Bailey·3 w/ Sulkoff
Detroit
LOCATION34 w/ Bailey·6 w/ Sulkoff
Bradley Edwards
PERSON33 w/ Bailey·6 w/ Sulkoff
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON32 w/ Bailey·6 w/ Sulkoff
LE
Levine
PERSON31 w/ Bailey·6 w/ Sulkoff
HR
Haley Robson
PERSON35 w/ Bailey·2 w/ Sulkoff