Epstein Secrets

sentatives have made." C • OAlmendarez- Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 237-38,118 S. Ct. 1219, 1277-28, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). To that end, the Supreme Court has cautioned that, "rewrit[ing] a law to conform it to constitutional requirements ... would constitute a serious WESTLAW @ 2020 Thomson Reuters.

s defense team, along with the federal prosecutors assigned to Epstein's case and the Chief of the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section of the Department of Justice's Criminal Division in Washington, D.C. Epstein's defense team again raised federalism-based arguments that were rejected. As U.S. Attorney Acosta explained, "[a]fter

at the Seventh Circuit puts few limits on conspiracy charges. Black noted that if a split does materialize, it could make an attractive question for the U.S. Supreme Court to weigh in on, given the court's interest in statutory interpretation and harmonizing criminal law in the circuits. The Hoskins case, with all the

n and Kristy Jean Greenberg of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, and by Michael Parker and Parker Tobin of the U.S. Department of Justice's Criminal Division. Von der Goltz is represented by Alexander Benjamin Spiro, William A. Burck and Daniel Rickert Koffmann of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP.

at the Seventh Circuit puts few limits on conspiracy charges. Black noted that if a split does materialize, it could make an attractive question for the U.S. Supreme Court to weigh in on, given the court's interest in statutory interpretation and harmonizing criminal law in the circuits. The Hoskins case, with all the

st for comment. The government is represented b of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern istnct o ew or an y r anParker obin of the U.S. Department of Justice's Criminal Division. Von der Goltz is represented by of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP. The case is U.S. v. Ramses Owens et al., case number 1:18-cr-00693, in