Epstein Secrets

t has made it abundantly plain that, whatever the outcome of this litigation, the agreement it made with Mr. Epstein will stand. indeed, controlling Supreme Court case law prevents it from doing otherwise. Mr. Epstein has fully performed his side of the bargain with the government, and when a bargain is based

s MOTION for Hearing filed by United States of America. (Lee, Dexter) (Entered: 04/08/2011) 04/08/201 1 a 04/08/2011 ...... a ) SYSTEM ENTRY — Docket Entry 63 restricted/scaled until further notice. (dj) (Entered: 04/08/2011) 04/08/2011 6 SYSTEM ENTRY — Docket Entry 64 restricted/sealed until further

ns at issue, each of these categories and subcategories of documents could improperly influence witnesses and jurors. Under the approach ratified by the Supreme Court in Robbins Tire, BOP properly withheld these records under Exemption 7(A). B. BOP Properly Withheld Records and Information Pursuant to FOIA Exempti

. Declaration of Russell Capone, Counsel to the Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York ("Capone Declaration") ¶ 4; see Docket Entry dated July 8, 2019, United States v. Epstein, No. 19-cr-490 (RMB) (S.D.N.Y.). On July 23, 2019, Epstein apparently attempted suicide in his cell at

ns at issue, each of these categories and subcategories of documents could improperly influence witnesses and jurors. Under the approach ratified by the Supreme Court in Robbins Tire, BOP properly withheld these records under Exemption 7(A). B. BOP Properly Withheld Records and Information Pursuant to FOIA Exempti

. Declaration of Russell Capone, Counsel to the Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York ("Capone Declaration") ¶ 4; see Docket Entry dated July 8, 2019, United States v. Epstein, No. 19-cr-490 (RMB) (S.D.N.Y.). On July 23, 2019, Epstein apparently attempted suicide in his cell at

ns at issue, each of these categories and subcategories of documents could improperly influence witnesses and jurors. Under the approach ratified by the Supreme Court in Robbins Tire, BOP properly withheld these records under Exemption 7(A). B. BOP Properly Withheld Records and Information Pursuant to FOIA Exempti

. Declaration of Russell Capone, Counsel to the Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York ("Capone Declaration") ¶ 4; see Docket Entry dated July 8, 2019, United States v. Epstein, No. 19-cr-490 (RMB) (S.D.N.Y.). On July 23, 2019, Epstein apparently attempted suicide in his cell at

empt to engraft a right of access to government information to section 3771(c)(1) should be rejected. In Pennsylvania'. Ritchie, 480 U.S. 39 (1987), the Supreme Court recognized that the Confrontation Clause grants a criminal defendant a trial right to cross- examine a witness. It hastened to add, "[tjhe ability to

jury. Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(c), the Government cannot confirm or deny the accuracy of those allegations. Likewise, portions of Exhibit A to Docket Entry 48 refer to matters occurring before the Grand Jury. Notwithstanding Petitioners' citations to the First Amendment and the interest of the press an

empt to engraft a right of access to government information to section 3771(cXI) should be rejected. In Pennsylvania v. Ritchie, 480 U.S. 39 (1987), the Supreme Court recognized that the Confrontation Clause grants a criminal defendant a trial right to cross- examine a witness. It hastened to add, Itthe ability to

jury. Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e), the Government cannot confirm or deny the accuracy of those allegations. Likewise, portions of Exhibit A to Docket Entry 48 refer to matters occurring before the Grand Jury. Notwithstanding Petitioners' citations to the First Amendment and the interest of the press an

tempt to engraft a right of access to government information to section 3771(cXI) should be rejected. In Pennsylvania'. Ritchie, 480 U.S. 39 (1987), the Supreme Court recognized that the Confrontation Clause grants a criminal defendant a trial right to cross- examine a witness. It hastened to add, Itthe ability to

jury. Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e), the Government cannot confirm or deny the accuracy of those allegations. Likewise, portions of Exhibit A to Docket Entry 48 refer to matters occurring before the Grand Jury. Notwithstanding Petitioners' citations to the First Amendment and the interest of the press an