Epstein Secrets

RA hearing had been scheduled to determine a risk assessment level, accompanied by a copy of the recommendation of the Board. See A67 (Letter from Supreme Court, dated Aug. 26, 2010); A.65 (Recommendation of Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders ("Board Recommendation").). In stark contrast to the other

y interests and triggers due process safeguards). Courts evaluating that liberty interest under the procedural due process analysis articulated by the U.S. Supreme Court in Matthews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976) (balancing the private interest affected by state action, the risk of erroneous deprivation of that i

Z Justice of the Supreme Court 13 14 APPEARANCES: 15 16 For the People: CYRUS R. VANCE, JR., ESQ., New York County District Attorney 17 One Hogan Place NewY York 10013 18 BY: GAFFNEY, ESQ. Assis an strict Attorney 19 For the Defense: KIRKLAND & ELLI, LLP 20 153 East 53rd Street 21 New

, New York 10022-4611 Telephone: (212) 446-4800 Facsimile: (212) 446-4900 1. Attorneks for Defendant Jeffrey E. E PFetPth I LED FEB 0 9 2011 IESUPRUME COURT NEW YORK COUNTY APPSALn C41.1911eO1/41.3 EFTA00792406 A4 Order Appealed From, dated January 18, 2011 with Notice of Entr) [pp. A4-ASI • pa*

K, —against— JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Respondent, Defendant-Appellant. APPENDIX CYRUS R. VANCE, JR. NEW YORK COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE One Hogan Place New York, New York 10013 Attorneys for Respondent JAY P. LEFKOWITZ SANDRA LYNN MUSUMECI 1Cnua-AND & Mem LLP 601 Lexington Avenue New York, New

Level 3 determination falls short of the minimum due process rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. In the landmark case of Goldberg a Kelly, the U.S. Supreme Court held that, in relevant part, to demonstrate compliance with the procedural due process requirement 47 EFTA00181129 EFTA00181130 that the decis

ew York 10022-4611 4. NAME, ADDRESS, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT: Cyrus R. Vance, Jr. NEW YORK DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE One Hogan Place New York, NY 10013 Telephone: 5. COURT AND COUNTY, OR ADMINISTRATIVE BODY, FROM WHICH APPEAL IS TAKEN: New York Supreme Court (Criminal Term), Ne

Level 3 determination falls short of the minimum due process rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. In the landmark case of Goldberg v. Kelly, the U.S. Supreme Court held that, in relevant part, to demonstrate compliance with the procedural due process requirement 47 EFTA00231594 that the decision maker's con

phone: Facsimile: 4. NAME, ADDRESS, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT: Cyrus R. Vance, Jr. NEW YORK DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE One Hogan Place New York, NYilli m Telephone: 5. COURT AND COUNTY, OR ADMINISTRATIVE BODY, FROM WHICH APPEAL IS TAKEN: New York Supreme Court (Criminal Term), New