Back to Network
3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
Document Mentions (3 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ns at issue, each of these categories and subcategories of documents could improperly influence witnesses and jurors. Under the approach ratified by the Supreme Court in Robbins Tire, BOP properly withheld these records under Exemption 7(A). B. BOP Properly Withheld Records and Information Pursuant to FOIA Exempti
st be either pending or reasonably foreseeable at the time of the withholding. See, e.g.,Kay v. F.C.C., 976 F. Supp. 23, 37-38 (D.D.C. 1997) (citing N.L.R.B. v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.,437 U.S. 214, 220 (1978)). The government's burden to establish the applicability of Exemption 7(A) is not high; the gov
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ns at issue, each of these categories and subcategories of documents could improperly influence witnesses and jurors. Under the approach ratified by the Supreme Court in Robbins Tire, BOP properly withheld these records under Exemption 7(A). B. BOP Properly Withheld Records and Information Pursuant to FOIA Exempti
st be either pending or reasonably foreseeable at the time of the withholding. See, e.g.,Kay v. F.C.C., 976 F. Supp. 23, 37-38 (D.D.C. 1997) (citing N.L.R.B. v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.,437 U.S. 214, 220 (1978)). The government's burden to establish the applicability of Exemption 7(A) is not high; the gov
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ns at issue, each of these categories and subcategories of documents could improperly influence witnesses and jurors. Under the approach ratified by the Supreme Court in Robbins Tire, BOP properly withheld these records under Exemption 7(A). B. BOP Properly Withheld Records and Information Pursuant to FOIA Exempti
st be either pending or reasonably foreseeable at the time of the withholding. See, e.g.,Kay v. F.C.C., 976 F. Supp. 23, 37-38 (D.D.C. 1997) (citing N.L.R.B. v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.,437 U.S. 214, 220 (1978)). The government's burden to establish the applicability of Exemption 7(A) is not high; the gov
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (154)
Entities connected to both Supreme Court and N.L.R.B. v.
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON487 w/ Supreme·5 w/ N.L.R.B.
United States
LOCATION304 w/ Supreme·4 w/ N.L.R.B.
George W. Bush
PERSON238 w/ Supreme·3 w/ N.L.R.B.
the Southern District
LOCATION161 w/ Supreme·3 w/ N.L.R.B.
Bradley Edwards
PERSON149 w/ Supreme·2 w/ N.L.R.B.
FBI
ORGANIZATION132 w/ Supreme·2 w/ N.L.R.B.
Paul Ryan
PERSON85 w/ Supreme·2 w/ N.L.R.B.
Geoffrey S. Berman
PERSON80 w/ Supreme·2 w/ N.L.R.B.
Second Circuit
ORGANIZATION78 w/ Supreme·2 w/ N.L.R.B.
CO
Collins
PERSON78 w/ Supreme·2 w/ N.L.R.B.
Bernie Sanders
PERSON67 w/ Supreme·2 w/ N.L.R.B.
The Washington Post
ORGANIZATION55 w/ Supreme·3 w/ N.L.R.B.
Alberto Gonzales
PERSON53 w/ Supreme·3 w/ N.L.R.B.
Sarah Ferguson
PERSON52 w/ Supreme·3 w/ N.L.R.B.
Andrew Cuomo
PERSON49 w/ Supreme·3 w/ N.L.R.B.
The New York Times
ORGANIZATION48 w/ Supreme·3 w/ N.L.R.B.
Martha Stewart
PERSON46 w/ Supreme·2 w/ N.L.R.B.
PE
Perez
PERSON45 w/ Supreme·2 w/ N.L.R.B.
Ronald Reagan
PERSON44 w/ Supreme·2 w/ N.L.R.B.
CA
Carney
PERSON42 w/ Supreme·3 w/ N.L.R.B.