Epstein Secrets

urf Wars, National Law Journal, p. A36 (November 18, 2002) Busing and Desegregation, National Law Journal, p. A24 (October 18, 1999) Lie Detection: The Supreme Court's Polygraph Decision, 70 New York State Bar Journal 34 (1998) Perverting the First Amendment, New York Law Journal, p.2 (January 8, 1998) Prosecutor

District Court for the Southern District of New York (1985-1992) Panel member, Homicide, Felony, and Appellate panels, First Department, New York State Supreme Court (1976-present) Assisted in death penalty litigation with Southern Prisoners Defense Committee, Atlanta, Georgia (1989-90) Supervised law students

crime) Member, Mayor's Committee for the Enforcement of Law During Civil Disorders (1969) Criminal Defense Litigation 16 EFTA00073183 Author of Amicus Brief in Matter of Robert Gorghan v. DeAngelis et al., New York State Court of Appeals (September, 2006). Author of Amicus Brief in People v. Ange

Spanish speaker) filed a lawsuit, as a class representative, to enjoin the English-only policy as discriminatory. t Id. at 279, 121 S. Ct. at [515. The P u Supreme Court held Ms. Sandoval did not have a private right of action to enforce the agency's regulations that forbid Alabama from using policies with discrimi

of action to enforce her own CVRA statutory rights (not agency regulations). I explain how the Majority misapplies f Sandoval. Fourth, I review the Amicus Brief of three U.S. Senators that also supports Judge Branch's conclusion that the CVRA's plain text does not condition a victim's rights and remed

basis of race or ethnicity and so structure its selection process as to admit an essentially predetermined proportion of members of certain groups. The Supreme Court’s decision in Bakke accepted our argument against the sort of racial quotas employed by the medical school at issue, but it approved affirmative action

was then working as the top lawyer for the American Jewish Congress, a generally progressive social action organization. He asked me to help draft an Amicus in the Bakke brief that presented the views of Jews who supported civil rights but who were concerned about the impact of race-specific affirmative a