Epstein Secrets

ious banks are not identical. In Bush, following the Supreme Court’s instructions in Steel Co., the district court dis

ising funds for HIRO, Sanabel-al Kheer, WAMY, and Al-Haramain. As for other contacts with the United States, Pr

539 (2005) 10 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 789 Saudi-based charities that were sponsors of al Qaida’s operations, including ITRO, MWL, WAMY, BIF, SHC, SJRC, and al Haramain. (Federal Compl. Jf 442-43.) 31 The Federal Plaintiffs seek leave to supplement the record against Prince Salman and Prince Naif with an article tha

other Saudi banks’ Rule 12(b)(6) motions cannot apply to NCB because the allegations against the various banks are not identical. In Bush, following the Supreme Court’s instructions in Steel Co., the district court dismissed the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction after finding plaintiffs lacked standing to

ernation- al Islamic Relief Organization (“IIRO”),'* Al Haramain,'” Muslim World League (““MWL”)," and the World A

ic Relief Organization (“IIRO”),'* Al Haramain,'” Muslim World League (““MWL”)," and the World Assembly of Muslim Youth “WAMY”).! Ashton Com- denied Al Haramain’s motion to dismiss the Burnett action. Burnett I, 274 F.Supp.2d at 107. 18. MWL is the parent of IIRO. See, e.g., Bur- nett Complaint {| 236. 19. WA

upport of this argument, the Federal Plaintiffs cite Dole Food Co. v. Patrickson, 538 U.S. 468, 480, 123 S.Ct. 1655, 155 L.Ed.2d 643 (2003), in which the Supreme Court held that instrumentality status is determined at the time of the filing of the complaint. has specifically addressed the issue. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_01

e of personal jurisdiction over them for the claims as pled would not comport with due process. Id. at 93-95. Plaintiffs thereafter sought review by the U.S. Supreme Court of each of these three principal holdings. In response to a request from the Supreme Court, the United States filed an amicus brief on May 29, 2009,

al Qaeda training camps in Afghanistan, as confirmed by a 1996 CIA Report.“! The direct involvement of Appellee Aqeel and al-Buthe in orchestrating al Haramain’s terrorist activities was also well documented. As defendant Aqeel himself stated, “[t]he [al Haramain branch] offices’ directors are employees who fo