Epstein Secrets

rticle » Fed. Circ. Grants Atty Fees In 'Demeaning' Goat IP Case The Federal Circuit ordered a New York attorney to pay legal fees Thursday, after the U.S. Supreme Court refused to take up his challenge to a GOVERNMENT AGENCIES Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services California Attorney General's Office Co

York Attorney General's Office New York City Council New York State Department of Financial Services Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Ohio Supreme Court Oregon Attorney General's Office Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rhode Island Attorney General's Office Stat

fizer Inc. acquisition led to his conviction for insider trading. Read full article » NJ Justices Scrap Rule Requiring Firms To Include Atty Name The New Jersey Supreme Court has nixed the requirement that a law firm's trade name include the name of an attorney and describe the nature of its practice, but maintained that

in opposition to a plea. The prosecutor refused to convey that information to the court and the trial judge accepted the plea. When the issue reached the Utah Supreme Court, the court concluded that the prosecutor had an ethical obligation as an officer of the court to convey that information to the judge: Prosecutors m

n handedly to both prosecution and the defense. Neither side is required to disclose the address or telephone number of a victim, thus complying with the Supreme Court's instruction that "in the absence of a strong showing of state interests to the contrary, discovery must be a two- 204 See infra notes 528-539 and ac

g the trial). 376 An illustration of the general approach of the proposed rule comes from the leading case of State v. Timmendequas, 37? decided by the New Jersey Supreme Court. In Timmendequas, the trial judge imported a jury from a distant community to hear a capital case rather than forcing the family of a murdered young

--- Page 21 of 52 2005 B.Y.U.L. Rev. 835, *870 court, and the trial judge accepted the plea. The victim then obtained legal counsel and appealed to the Utah Supreme Court, urging that under the Utah Victims’ Rights Amendment, her right to be heard regarding a plea had been violated. The State responded that the victim

also resided in that state would be incidental. An understanding of the Article II] provision as protecting the community's interest is bolstered by the Supreme Court's decisions on right of public access to trials. In cases such as Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia, 7°4 the Court has held that a guarantee of the

le information for the judge on where to transfer the case to (e.g., to an adjacent state rather than a distant one). 212 a capital case decided by the New Jersey Supreme Court. In Timmendequas, the trial judge imported a jury from a distant community rather than force the family of a murdered young girl to travel to another