Epstein Secrets

ization, 46 Hastings L. Journal 1247, 1248 (1995) ("No one can doubt Congress's virtual plenary authority over criminal matters as a consequence of the Supreme Court's expansive interpretation of the Commerce Clause."); Stephen Chippendale, More Harm Than Good Assessing Federalization of Criminal Law, 79 Minn. L.

riminal Law, 79 Minn. L. Rev. 455, 462-63 (1994) (attributing the federalization of crime to the expansion of the Commerce Clause under Perez). 6 Sara Sun Beale, What's Law Got To Do With It? The Political, Social, Psychological and Other Non-Legal Factors Influencing the Development of (Federal) Criminal La

ization, 46 Hastings L. Journal 1247, 1248 (1995) ("No one can doubt Congress's virtual plenary authority over criminal matters as a consequence of the Supreme Court's expansive interpretation of the Commerce Clause."); Stephen Chippendale, More Harm Than Good Assessing Federalization of Criminal Law, 79 Minn. L.

riminal Law, 79 Minn. L. Rev. 455, 462-63 (1994) (attributing the federalization of crime to the expansion of the Commerce Clause under Perez). 6 Sara Sun Beale, What's Law Got To Do With It? The Political, Social, Psychological and Other Non-Legal Factors Influencing the Development of (Federal) Criminal La

l protection doctrine but challenging current precedent). °4 Grand juries remain a fixture in the federal system and in roughly half the states. See Sara Sun Beale et al., Grand Jury Law and Practice § 1:5 (2d ed. 2017) (describing grand jury status and rules in states and noting states that have partially or wh

e citizens with "honest services" 1°? 160 - wrongdoing for which the public harm is sometimes hard to identify. [#894] By some accounts, including the U.S. Supreme Court's on occasion, 1°! this enforcement agenda has been overly aggressive. '°? But Congress has generally encouraged far-reaching federal enforcement, not

People Priority Goal"). 46 See Lichtblau, supra note 141. 47 See Paul G. Cassell & James R. Marsh, Full Restitution for Child Pornography Victims: The Supreme Court's Paroline Decision and the Need for a Congressional Response, /3 Ohio St. J. Crim. L. 1, 7 (2015). 48 See U.S. Dep't of Justice, supra note 145, at I

* * Professor of Law, S.J. Quinney College of Law of the University of Utah, Judge, U.S. District Court for the District of Utah, 2002-07. Thanks to Sara Sun Beale, Doug Beloof, Doug Berman, Russell Butler, Matt Cannon, Meg Garvin, Nancy King, Erik Luna, Peter McCabe, Benjamin McMurray, Ross McPhail, Dan Medwed,

in opposition to a plea. The prosecutor refused to convey that information to the court and the trial judge accepted the plea. When the issue reached the Utah Supreme Court, the court concluded that the prosecutor had an ethical obligation as an officer of the court to convey that information to the judge: Prosecutors m

n handedly to both prosecution and the defense. Neither side is required to disclose the address or telephone number of a victim, thus complying with the Supreme Court's instruction that "in the absence of a strong showing of state interests to the contrary, discovery must be a two- 204 See infra notes 528-539 and ac