Epstein Secrets

that it should substitute itself for the district court on an expedited basis to exercise the discretion reposed in the district judge, contrary to the Supreme Court's teaching in Nixon. Reposing this discretion in the district court is founded on two principles. One is that the sealed materials were filed in tha

Case 18-2868, Document 141, 03/15/2019, 2519388, Pagel of 27 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse 40 Foley Square, New York, NY 10007 Telephone: 212-85

rials, and (2) to hold in abeyance the Orders until the disposition of this Motion. EFTA00791870 Case 18-2868, Document 141, 03/15/2019, 2519388, Page3 of 27 Introduction The panel's Order to Show Cause and March 13 Order directing the appellees to produce the sealed and redacted summary judgment

e sealed and redacted information, not only will she be able to continue pursuing 3 EFTA00791872 Case 18-2868, Document 141, 03/15/2019, 2519388, Page5 of 27 publicity for profit, but also she will be able to engage in the prurient trafficking of others' private, personal and confidential informati

atement reveals how inapposite a federal prosecution is to the facts in this case. Importantly, we note that the CEOS review was conducted prior to the Supreme Court's very recent decisions in Santos and Cuellar, which we believe—illuminating as they do the Court's interpretive methodology when it comes to federal

erson ..."). § 2423(b) is not such a statute. Federal court decisions watering down the "for the purpose of " requi ment fly in the face of the two Suprems Court decisions addressing that element. See Hansen'. Huff, 291 U.S. 559 (1934); Mortensen. United States, 322 U.S. 369 (1944). Santos and Cuellar speak l

ORGANIZATION: FAX #: Sot 835-- 16 q SUBJECT: cre c--- #vggetau FROM: A A. frtakie Vidacarno._ (561) 820-8711 (561) 820-8777 (Fax) NUMBER OF PAGES, INCLUDING THIS PAGE: 2 - COMMENTS: 08-80736-CV-MARRA RFP WPB 001699 EFTA00209878 United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida

orgetting who told him about some bozo's wife. Bill Clinton was not even prosecuted for obstruction of justice offenses so egregious that the entire Supreme Court staged a historic boycott of his State of the Union address in 2000. By contrast, Linda Tripp, whose only mistake was befriending the office hosebag

tarr's hiring. Epstein's spokesman, Howard Rubenstein. had no comment. Last year. Starr, who was president of Pepperdine University. argued before the U.S. Supreme Court that an Alaska school had the right to suspend a student for unfurling a "Bong Hits 4 Jesus" banner. Starr is also repping BlaCkwater, the private

JUVENILE) Tetreault, Wendy Juv Intake) Thomas, Bully Int Res) Thomas, Debra Fel 7) Thomas, Kelly Appeals) Tribuiani, Robert INTAKE) Turek, Paige DOVE•HrnS)Uilman. Barbara ref. Horn.) Vacirca, Eileen CC P) Valentine, Tim DOVE) Valley, Colons Belle Glade) Vidal, Zelda Fel 5) Vila, Elvia

, New York 10022-4611 Telephone: (212) 446-4800 Facsimile: (212) 446-4900 1. Attorneks for Defendant Jeffrey E. E PFetPth I LED FEB 0 9 2011 IESUPRUME COURT NEW YORK COUNTY APPSALn C41.1911eO1/41.3 EFTA00792406 A4 Order Appealed From, dated January 18, 2011 with Notice of Entr) [pp. A4-ASI • pa*

onally known to me, / a l " Signature of Polk Officer' (F.S.S. 117.10) State of Florida County of Palm Beach Signal ng Officer Date: 0 1/2006 Paget? f 22 EFTA00792425 A23 Probable Cause Affidavit Palm Beach Police Department Agency OW PLO 50000 During the course of the investigation a sear

ecords, which the Court held "must remain inviolate." Id. at 17. By its terms, Rule 2.420 does not apply to criminal cases; however, later this year the Supreme Court will consider amendments to the rule that essentially seek to apply the standards applicable in civil cases to criminal ones. See In re Amendments t

of Florida 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Patin Beach, FL 33401-6235 TO: ORGANIZATION: FAX #: SUBJECT:S i FROM: • x) NUMBER OF PAGES, INCLUDING THIS PAGE: COMMENTS: Original document: To follow via regular mail . To follow via Federal Express tz _vio follow via hand deli

ly, creating et ante limitations on how a warrant is to be executed is inconsistent with the role for issuing magistrates that has been set forth by the Supreme Court. As set forth in Dalia I. United States 441 U.S. 238, 258 (1979), "It would extend the Warrant Clause to the extreme to require that, whenever it is

Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-000873 Pla•lirAPrnerramo/311F;leacWilialPTITIMNeserheMlIVAR151141(17N111A1O77115(14416 1 P R/1 SOA(16 EFTA00228253 Pagel of 48 ACCOUNT NUMBER PAYMENT DUE DATE NEW BALANCE MINIMUM OUE 02/13/2004 I St .617.22 I 532.00 JEFFREY E EPSTEIN 457 MADISON AVENUE C/O J